28.02.2013 Views

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Harousseau <strong>and</strong> Attal 227<br />

Table 1. IFM94 study, comparison of one <strong>and</strong> two autoSCTs (intention to treat analysis)<br />

Arm A, one autoSCT Arm B, two autoSCTs P value<br />

n 105 95<br />

CR 33% 34% NS<br />

VGPR 7% 11% NS<br />

2-year EFS 52% 58% NS<br />

2-year survival 73% 69% NS<br />

GM-CSF) after transplant <strong>and</strong> of peripheral <strong>blood</strong> instead of bone <strong>marrow</strong><br />

progenitors has dramatically reduced the duration of myelosuppression induced by<br />

HDT. As a consequence, the duration of hospitalization <strong>and</strong>, it is hoped, the costs<br />

have been significantly reduced. However, contamination of the <strong>autologous</strong> graft<br />

by the malignant clone remains a critical concern even with <strong>blood</strong> progenitors.<br />

Sensitive methods, including amplification of the patient's rearranged gene, allow<br />

myeloma cells to be detected in <strong>blood</strong> <strong>and</strong> apheresis products. Attempts to purge<br />

<strong>marrow</strong> with cyclophosphamide derivatives or monoclonal antibodies are feasible<br />

but induce prolonged myelosuppression. Selection of CD34 +<br />

progenitors appears to<br />

be a promising alternative. Tumor depletion up to 4.5 logs can be obtained with this<br />

technique, but sophisticated assays for detection of minimal residual disease show<br />

the persistence of myeloma cells in the CD34 +<br />

cell fraction. The clinical impact of<br />

this cumbersome <strong>and</strong> expensive procedure has not yet been fully evaluated. 2<br />

The question of the source of stem cells has been also addressed by the IFM94<br />

trial. At the time of stem cell collection, patients were r<strong>and</strong>omized between<br />

autoBMT <strong>and</strong> PBPCT. PBPC were collected after priming with G-CSF alone (10<br />

ug/kg/d for 7 days starting on day 17 after VAD course). However, investigators<br />

were allowed to perform a CD34 +<br />

cell selection either on bone <strong>marrow</strong> or PBPC.<br />

Of the first 200 patients, 172 underwent the second r<strong>and</strong>omization (78 BM, 94<br />

PBPC).<br />

However, 20 patients have not been transplanted (10 ABMT, 10 PBSCT), 22<br />

patients assigned to receive ABMT were actually transplanted with PBPC, <strong>and</strong> one<br />

patient r<strong>and</strong>omized to receive PBPC was actually transplanted with BM.<br />

According to the protocol, CD34 selection was performed in 35 cases (nine<br />

ABMT, 26 PBPCT). Finally, 129 of the 172 r<strong>and</strong>omized patients (75%) were<br />

transplanted as per protocol (37 BM, 35 CD34, <strong>and</strong> 57 PBPC). There was no<br />

significant difference between the three groups regarding the main initial characteristics,<br />

the first r<strong>and</strong>omization, <strong>and</strong> the response to initial CC. With a short<br />

follow-up (median 26 months) the clinical outcome did not appear to differ significantly<br />

(Table 2).<br />

The only difference between the three groups concerned hematopoietic<br />

reconstitution. The median durations of neutropenia (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!