28.02.2013 Views

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

582 Chapter 10: Graft Manipulation<br />

BM (i.e., BM harvested from individuals who are not receiving hematopoietic<br />

growth factor therapy <strong>and</strong> who generally have not received any myelosuppressive<br />

chemotherapy within the month or more before BM harvesting). From this<br />

observation, we hypothesized that the accelerated engraftment associated with<br />

PBSC is the result of the priming before stem cell harvesting <strong>and</strong> is not due to the<br />

anatomic derivation of the stem cells. Alternatively stated, our hypothesis was that<br />

BM harvested following a mobilizing treatment with cytokines should produce as<br />

rapid a hematologic recovery as PBSC harvested following the same treatment.<br />

Recently, Beyer et al. 19<br />

<strong>and</strong> Schmitz et al. 20<br />

have presented prospective,<br />

r<strong>and</strong>omized trials comparing resting BM with mobilized PBSC <strong>autologous</strong><br />

transplants. These authors observed more rapid recovery of both circulating<br />

neutrophils (2 days <strong>and</strong> 1 day faster, respectively) <strong>and</strong> circulating platelets (7 days<br />

faster in both trials) with the mobilized PBSC. Because the conditioning of the<br />

patients before harvesting was different for BM collections (no conditioning) than<br />

for PBSC collections (chemotherapy followed by G-CSF 19<br />

or G-CSF administered<br />

as a single agent for PBSC mobilization 20<br />

), these results are not inconsistent with<br />

our hypothesis.<br />

To test our hypothesis, we have conducted a r<strong>and</strong>omized, stratified, prospective<br />

trial comparing <strong>blood</strong>- <strong>and</strong> <strong>marrow</strong>-derived stem cells harvested under identical<br />

growth factor-stimulating conditions. The following is a report of our data<br />

describing rates of posttransplant hematologic recovery <strong>and</strong> also the duration of<br />

posttransplant disease-free survival.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Patients<br />

Beginning in June 1993, patients were recruited from our referred patient<br />

population. To be eligible for this study, patients were required never to have had<br />

evidence of their malignant disease in their bone <strong>marrow</strong> by histologic criteria <strong>and</strong><br />

could not have had a leukemic disorder. The majority of the patients in the trial had<br />

either breast cancer or lymphoma (Table 1). Patients were informed of the trial <strong>and</strong><br />

gave written consent to participate, as approved by the Scientific Review<br />

Committee of the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center <strong>and</strong> as approved <strong>and</strong> annually<br />

reviewed by the Institutional Review Board of the University of South Florida.<br />

Mobilization/priming, harvesting, <strong>and</strong> cryopreservation<br />

Patients received G-CSF (filgrastim), 16 pg/kg intravenously per day for 9 days.<br />

On day 6, BM was harvested, <strong>and</strong> on days 7 through 10, leukaphereses were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!