28.02.2013 Views

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fisher 687<br />

acetabulum. The curve is normalized to percent administered activity per gram<br />

(%ID/g) with measurement of a <strong>marrow</strong> biopsy specimen from the same patient.<br />

The area under the curve provides the residence time for a <strong>marrow</strong> dose<br />

calculation.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Marrow absorbed doses should be estimated individually for each patient who<br />

receives an internal administration of a therapeutic radiopharmaceutical. The<br />

variation in patient-specific parameters dictates that each dose assessment be<br />

customized or tailored to each patient. Results will depend on the method, model,<br />

<strong>and</strong> assumptions used in the dose calculation.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Many factors influence the calculated absorbed dose to red <strong>marrow</strong> from an<br />

internally administered radionuclide. The three approaches described above apply<br />

to different sets of starting assumptions. Additionally, the models on which the<br />

calculations are based may be subject to change from time to time, leading to<br />

differences in calculated results. Direct measurements of <strong>marrow</strong> radioactivity in<br />

vivo are also subject to normal statistical counting errors <strong>and</strong> measurement<br />

uncertainties. And finally, the dose-related response of patients to high <strong>marrow</strong><br />

doses from protracted, low-dose-rate irradiation is highly variable.<br />

Choice of appropriate S value<br />

The mean dose per unit cumulated activity (or S value) for each source organ<br />

<strong>and</strong> target organ pair has been calculated for more than 120 different radionuclides<br />

<strong>and</strong> for more than 10 different anthropomorphic models of the human representing<br />

different ages, sizes, <strong>and</strong> sexes. Since the S value accounts for transport of radiation<br />

as well as the physical structure of <strong>marrow</strong> tissue, the derivation of S values is<br />

complicated. As scientists revise their model representations of bone <strong>marrow</strong><br />

structure <strong>and</strong> composition <strong>and</strong> refine their physics calculations for a broad<br />

spectrum of radiation emissions <strong>and</strong> energies, they obtain new sets of tabulated 5<br />

values to choose from. Three major sets of <strong>marrow</strong> S values are in common use,<br />

<strong>and</strong> each will result in a different <strong>marrow</strong> dose result:<br />

MIRD-11/MIRDOSE1 (1975). The first comprehensive tabulation of S values<br />

was completed by the MIRD committee 9<br />

in 1975. The basis for the <strong>marrow</strong> 5<br />

values was prior work by Spiers, 10-12<br />

who measured chord-length distribution in<br />

skeletal trabeculae <strong>and</strong> <strong>marrow</strong> cavities <strong>and</strong> calculated the energy deposited by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!