10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

86 LIFE OF ARCHBISHOP TAIT [CH. iv.<br />

there is little additional information to be gained from it.<br />

In a letter to Professor Sewell, who had published a<br />

pamphlet against the Tract, 1 he thus describes his own<br />

action :<br />

&quot;<br />

I cannot tell you how strongly I feel the danger of young<br />

men s minds being altogether unsettled by the tone which char<br />

acterises the Tract, and in which I have long been accustomed to<br />

hear individuals of the same sentiments with the writer express<br />

themselves in private. This danger has been forced upon my<br />

attention by several very painful Instances that have fallen under<br />

my personal observation. If young men lose their confidence in<br />

that branch of the Church of Christ of which they are members,<br />

and have their attention forced to curious questions that seem<br />

only to minister strife, there seems no telling to what extent<br />

their whole religious character may be affected. It wras<br />

under a<br />

strong sense of this danger that I felt bound to put myself in the<br />

invidious position of signing the letter which mainly called the<br />

attention of the University to this Tract. And I cannot tell you<br />

how glad I am to find that one who justly stands so high in public<br />

estimation as yourself has thought it necessary to enter a public<br />

protest against this unsettling spirit.&quot;<br />

Among the following letters of thanks that he received,<br />

the following, from Dr. Arnold, has, in the light of subse<br />

quent events, a peculiar interest :-<br />

The Rev. Dr. Arnold to the Rev. A. C. Tail.<br />

&quot;<br />

RUGBY, March n, 1841.<br />

&quot; MY DEAR SIR, I thank you much for sending me your<br />

address to the Author of the Tract.<br />

&quot;<br />

I am extremely glad that the Tract has been so noticed ; yet<br />

it is to me far more objectionable morally than theologically and<br />

;<br />

especially the comment on the 2ist Article, to which you<br />

have not alluded, is of such a character, that if subscription to<br />

the 2ist Article, justified by such rules of interpretation, may<br />

be honestly practised, I do not see why an Unitarian may not<br />

subscribe the first Article or the second. The comparative im-<br />

1<br />

&quot;A Letter to the Rev. E. B. Pusey, D.D., on the Publication of No. 90.<br />

By William Sewell, Professor of Moral Philosophy in the University of Oxford.&quot;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!