10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1860-64] AN AGITATION IJKdINS 279<br />

the rude flippancy of Dr. Williams with respect to the<br />

Divine claims of the Old Testament. 1<br />

The author of the fourth essay, the Rev. H. B. Wilson,<br />

had in 1841 been one of the four tutors who, with Tait as<br />

their leader, protested against Tract XC. ; and his views<br />

as to the meaning of honest subscription<br />

to the articles<br />

had evidently undergone a startling change in the twenty<br />

years that had elapsed, for he was now able to argue in<br />

favour of the very mode of interpretation which he had<br />

then denounced, and some pages of his essay upon the<br />

National Church gave more pain perhaps to devout minds<br />

than any<br />

others in the volume. 2<br />

But if the essayists had, to say the least, blindly com<br />

mitted themselves to rash and ill-considered statements<br />

in one direction,<br />

it cannot be denied that those who<br />

stood forth to answer or impugn them used language<br />

on the other side which would nowadays be generally<br />

regarded as scarcely less open to objection. In the judg<br />

ment of Bishop Tait, and of others who felt with him, the<br />

strain of denunciation in which the champions of ortho<br />

doxy indulged, and their dogmatic<br />

assertions as to what<br />

is essential to the faith, contributed not a little to the<br />

harmfulness of the whole controversy. 3 An agitation of<br />

the wildest sort immediately began. Addresses to the<br />

Archbishops came up from Rural Deaneries on every side,<br />

calling attention to the mischievous tendency<br />

of the<br />

Even Arthur Stanley in his tiery article in the Edinburgh Review in<br />

defence of the essayists condemns Dr. Williams s *<br />

flippant and contemp<br />

tuous tone and the unbecoming character of his remarks. Edin. Rev.,<br />

April 1861, p. 479.<br />

:<br />

See Essays and Reviews, pp. 180-183, 186, etc.<br />

; Even Bishop Wilberforce, for example, who was by no means the hottest<br />

of the controversialists, described men as in danger of being &quot;robbed<br />

unawares of the very foundations of the Faith,&quot; if they should be persuaded<br />

to<br />

&quot;<br />

accept allegorically, or as parable, or poetry, or legend, the story of a<br />

serpent tempter, of an ass speaking with man s voice, of an arresting of the<br />

earth s motion, or of a reversal of its motion.&quot; Charge of 1860, pp. 69, 70.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!