10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1866-68] BISHOP GRAY S SPEECH 381<br />

one resolution only, viz., the hypothetical one, should be put.<br />

l<br />

It was put, and carried almost unanimously and I ; thought that<br />

after all no great harm was done, as it was only a hypothetical<br />

proposition. Great therefore was my astonishment when we<br />

reached St. James s Hall to hear the Bishop of Capetown, as I<br />

understood him, announce that the last act of the Synod had<br />

been to give its approval to the consecration of a new Bishop for<br />

Natal. This made my blood boil, but I restrained myself in the<br />

room. I went out, and seeing the danger more clearly, as I<br />

thought of what had happened, I went to the Athenaeum, where<br />

I consulted the Bishop of Limerick, and was hurrying back to<br />

the hall with a note requesting the Bishop of Capetown to<br />

explain to the meeting, when I met Argyll and others, who told<br />

me the proceedings were all ended and the hall cleared. I<br />

confess to having been made very angry, and to having spoken in<br />

the strongest terms to various persons at my dinner-table of the<br />

inaccuracy of what appeared to have been announced. I wish I<br />

had not used such strong language, as it is not right.<br />

&quot;<br />

Next morning I wrote a note to the Times, which I sub<br />

mitted to Lincoln, Chester, Argyll, and others, and which, with<br />

2<br />

their approval, I published in all the papers.<br />

&quot; On Saturday we met again for Communion and Sermon in<br />

Lambeth Church. I had a note handed to the Bishop of Cape<br />

town, telling him of my letter to the Times.<br />

&quot;<br />

But notwithstanding this sad incident at the close, I feel that<br />

follows :<br />

The words of the Resolution as adopted by the Conference were as<br />

Resolulion vii.<br />

&quot;<br />

That \ve who are here present do acquiesce in the<br />

Resolution of the Convocation of Canterbury, passed on June 29, 1866, relat<br />

ing to the Diocese of Natal, to wit<br />

&quot;<br />

If it be decided that a new Bishop should be consecrated, As to the<br />

proper steps to be taken by the members of the Church in the<br />

province of Natal for obtaining a new Bishop, it is the opinion of<br />

this House, ^rtf, that a formal instrument,&quot; etc.<br />

See Resolutions of the Conference, published<br />

1 page 6.<br />

by authority (Rivingtons, 1867),<br />

&quot;<br />

The letter was as follows : SIR, As the Bishop of Capetown was by<br />

some understood to say, in his speech at St. James Hall yesterday, that the<br />

Conference of Bishops at Lambeth had given its approval to the appointment<br />

of a new Bishop of Natal, I beg leave to refer all your readers who are<br />

interested in this subject to the carefully guarded words of the resolution<br />

actually adopted by the Conference, which will, I believe, soon be published.<br />

-Yours, etc. A. C. LONDON.&quot;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!