10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I-IF1-: OK ARCHBISHOP TAIT [en. xin.<br />

view. I am satisfied on these points: i. The Bishops, even<br />

though only Grahamstown and I should be present, meet as the<br />

Synod of the pro<br />

Province, and also as a Court to try the corn-<br />

v in eial. 2. As a Synod they may declare what the faith of<br />

the Church is, and as a Court condemn. I will not be bound by<br />

the narrow limits, as to the Church s faith, laid down by Dr.<br />

Lushington or Privy Council. I will not recognise them as an<br />

authority as to what are the doctrines Avhich the Church of<br />

England allows to be taught.<br />

l<br />

. . .&quot;<br />

At the usual Bishops meeting held before the opening<br />

of Parliament, on February 4th, 1863, the position of<br />

Bishop Colenso was again under discussion. From the<br />

accounts of the meeting made public in the Biographies of<br />

Bishop Gray and Bishop Wilberforce, 2 it appears that the<br />

Bishops resolved by a large majority (i)<br />

Society for the Propagation of the Gospel to<br />

to advise the<br />

&quot;<br />

withhold<br />

its confidence from the Bishop of Natal until he has been<br />

cleared from the charges notoriously incurred by him<br />

(2) to inhibit the Bishop for the present from preaching<br />

in their dioceses. The following letter shows what was<br />

the Bishop of London s view as to the second of these<br />

resolutions :<br />

The Bishop of London to the Archbishop of Canterbury.<br />

&quot;LONDON HOUSE, Feb. 4, 1863.<br />

&quot; MY DEAR LORD,- -The decision arrived at this day by a large<br />

body of the Bishops, to adopt the Bishop of Oxford s motion, and<br />

publish a formal document binding the subscribers to inhibit the<br />

Bishop of Natal from officiating in their several dioceses, makes<br />

1<br />

Bishop Gray s Life, vol. ii. p. 32. It will be observed that the Metro<br />

politan is as little ready to be guided by the Archbishop s Court of Arches<br />

as by the Privy Council.<br />

- See above, p. 283. It is hardly necessary to caution those who may in<br />

vestigate the details of this controversy against accepting the long account of<br />

these meetings given in Bishop Gray s Biography, as other than the personal<br />

recollections and impressions of one of the parties in a sharp dispute.<br />

&quot;<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!