10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

j86 3 -6 7 ] CORRESPONDENCE ON SUBSCRIPTION 491<br />

and he believed the longer we lived the more we should become<br />

sensible that the Church of England owed a great debt of<br />

gratitude to the moderation and piety with which these men pre<br />

sided over her counsels. ... He would add his own deep and<br />

solemn conviction that if the Church of England was to live in<br />

the affections of this great country, and hold the place which it<br />

ought to hold in Christendom, it must ever be distinguished by<br />

that spirit of comprehensive love which enabled it to be really the<br />

National Church, and to secure the esteem even of those who<br />

l<br />

were separated from its<br />

pale.&quot;<br />

Most of the Bishops, however, and a large majority of<br />

the lay Peers, took an opposite line, and the bill was rejected<br />

by 90 votes against 50. 2 Then a pamphlet war began, and<br />

the question was fiercely debated in Convocation. Arthur<br />

Stanley published a copious<br />

and brilliant<br />

&quot;<br />

Letter to the<br />

Bishop of London upon one side, and Professor Ogilvie<br />

replied upon the other. Many of the London clergy were<br />

indignant at their Diocesan s readiness, as was said, to<br />

&quot;<br />

tamper with the time-hallowed safeguards of the<br />

Church,&quot; and an address was forwarded to Bishop Tait<br />

by his two Archdeacons, in which 446 of the clergy of<br />

the diocese recorded their solemn &quot;judgment that the<br />

attempts now made to abolish subscription are fraught<br />

with present danger and future evil to the Church, and<br />

as such are to be deprecated and opposed.&quot;<br />

A curious, it may be almost said an amusing, corre<br />

spondence followed. The Bishop, on receipt of this some<br />

what warlike document, asked his Archdeacons,<br />

&quot;<br />

in order<br />

that he might better understand their address,&quot; to send<br />

him a copy of the printed circular letter, not enclosed to<br />

him in the first instance, in which the signatures of the<br />

clergy had been invited. This letter had been rendered<br />

necessary by the reluctance of some of the clergy to sign<br />

J<br />

Hansard, May 19, 1863, pp. 1935-38.<br />

The two Archbishops and eleven Bishops voted in the majority ; foui<br />

Bishops (London, St. David s, Llandaff, and Derry) in the minority.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!