10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

iS 4 i] CORRESPONDENCE WITH STANLEY 97<br />

Three years is a long time to look forward to, and, by God s help,<br />

much may be done in Balliol and Oxford before then. Perhaps the<br />

I .ishop and Archbishop may not approve the Chancellor s plan,<br />

and then the matter is at an end, for I cannot in conscience leave<br />

Halliol now. But if I am to go in three years, if I live so long,<br />

let us work heart and hand during that time. I do not think late<br />

divisions need at all prevent co-operation among those who love<br />

what is good. Indeed, Newman pledges himself in a letter to the<br />

Bishop to co-operate with religious men of all opinions. Therefore<br />

let us make the most of the time while it lasts. But we shall do<br />

nothing unless we do it in a truly religious spirit, and make the<br />

good of our University the subject of our earnest prayers. Do, my<br />

dear Stanley, let us strive, while God gives us the opportunity, to<br />

do everything in a more seriously religious spirit. I fear our<br />

plans cannot do any good unless they are more the subject of<br />

our earnest prayers. There is no doubt we love what is good,<br />

but I fear we do not seek it in a sufficiently serious, religious<br />

spirit.<br />

&quot;I long very much to see you back here. Best regards to<br />

Pearson. Your affect, friend, A. C. TAIT.&quot;<br />

Rev. A. P. Stanley to Rev. A. C. Tait.<br />

&quot;GENOA, May 2, 1841.<br />

&quot; MY DEAR GREIS, Although I have but little time to write,<br />

and shall be in England so soon after my letter, I cannot help<br />

thanking you for your account of Oxford and yourself which I<br />

found here yesterday. I hope there was nothing in my foolish<br />

letter from Rome at all tending to annoy you, as, of course, not<br />

knowing facts, neither having read No. 90, nor the Tutors Pro<br />

test, I had no business to say anything. From what you say I<br />

cannot be surprised at any one using any measures against the<br />

Tract who thinks it unadvisable per se that Roman Catholics<br />

should be members of the Church of England still less at any<br />

one being angry at the tone which you describe as pervading No.<br />

90 though perhaps, as I myself see no reason against Roman<br />

Catholics being Anglicans, except the impracticability of it, I<br />

should not have objected to any mode of rendering it practicable<br />

which was not on other grounds objectionable. I shall be very<br />

anxious to see, Ward s pamphlet, of which your letter contains<br />

the first intimation. What, however, gave me most pleasure was<br />

VOL. i.<br />

G

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!