10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

400 LIFE OF ARCHBISHOP TAIT [CH. xv.<br />

Lindsay as its President. On February 7th, 1863, the<br />

first number of the Church Times appeared, and by the<br />

time the Church Association, in November 1865, rallied<br />

the militant forces upon the other side, the number of<br />

London churches was considerable in which an elaborate<br />

and significant ritual was coming into use, as distinguished<br />

from what was, comparatively speaking, the mere<br />

aestheticism of *<br />

restored churches, choral services, sur-<br />

pliced choirs, and other orderly and reverent arrange<br />

ments. 1<br />

Considering the objections which have in recent years<br />

been felt by moderate men of every school to litigation<br />

upon these ritual matters, it is curious to notice how<br />

general at that time was the opinion of High Churchmen<br />

that the questions in dispute might be, and indeed ought<br />

to be, set at rest by obtaining fresh decisions in the<br />

Courts of Law. It would be easy to multiply examples<br />

of this advice being given. The Rev. C. W. Furse, for<br />

example, then Vicar of Staines and Rural Dean, a pro<br />

minent and trusted High Churchman, wrote as follows<br />

in a published letter on February 5, 1866 :-<br />

&quot;There is only one efficient mode of settling the vexed<br />

question at issue between the extreme Ritualists and the Mode<br />

rates of the Church of England, and that is the course which was<br />

taken in the case of stone altars, crosses on chancel screens, etc.<br />

Until the legal question be decided, it is utterly<br />

futile to ask<br />

Bishops to take steps to suppress, by moral persuasion, such and<br />

such practices. We may as well provoke them to preach to the<br />

wind. . . . The silence of the la-v, if continued, may provoke<br />

priests to claim licence instead of liberty, and Bishops to mistake<br />

irritable impatience for a firm administration of the Church s<br />

law.&quot; 2<br />

1 On the aesthetic rather than doctrinal character of these changes, see an<br />

important letter written by Bishop \Vilberforce to Archbishop Longley on<br />

Dec. 16, 1865 ( Wilberforce 1<br />

s Life, vol. iii. p. 188). See also the speech of<br />

Lord Nelson in the House of Lords on May 14, 1867 (Hansard, p. 506).<br />

2 Guardian, Feb. 7, 1866, p. 123.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!