10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-*S 4 LIFE 01- ARCHDISHOr I<br />

AIT<br />

[CH. xn.<br />

When the formal letter of the Bishops was first pub<br />

lished in the newspapers, it was unfortunately not accom<br />

address to which it<br />

panied by a copy of the particular<br />

was a reply, and to this mistake may be traced not a<br />

little of the misunderstanding evidenced in some parts of<br />

the following correspondence. 1 The omission was soon<br />

rectified, but the mischief had been done.<br />

Canon A. P. Stanley to the Bis /top of London.<br />

&quot;Cn. CH., OXFORD, Feb. 16, 1861.<br />

&quot;Mv DEAR BISHOP, I do not know when I have been more<br />

to the document<br />

startled than in seeing your name appended<br />

which this morning appeared in the Times.<br />

&quot; You have yourself expressed to me in a manner so decided<br />

as to allow me to repeat your opinion in various places, that you<br />

saw nothing seriously to condemn in Jowett s Essay and hardly<br />

anything in Temple s.<br />

&quot;You also gave me to understand when I was at Fulham<br />

(and thus effectually prevented me from taking any active step in<br />

the matter) that no measure could be taken by the Bishops<br />

except a general recommendation to the clergy to preach the<br />

truth more actively. This second communication I considered<br />

confidential till now.<br />

&quot;<br />

I consider that the subscription of your name to this docu<br />

ment (especially paragraph 3) is in direct contradiction to what<br />

you have said to me on the occasion to which I refer. How can<br />

I explain this ? What can I say in your defence ? Ever yours,<br />

publication of these reminiscences of pioceedings<br />

&quot;<br />

A. P. STANLEY.&quot;<br />

which he has himself<br />

described as &quot;most confidential&quot; (Life, iii. 114). Strange to say, they have<br />

been incorporated, as though they were authoritative records,<br />

one popular<br />

&quot;<br />

History of the Church of England.&quot;<br />

in at least<br />

1<br />

It may be thought that this correspondence is reproduced at unnecessary<br />

length, and that the more personal part of the controversy might well have<br />

been omitted. But after consultation with the Bishop of London, and with the<br />

biographer of Dean Stanley,<br />

course that the whole correspondence should be left intact, as serving to throw<br />

it has seemed to all to be the fairest and wisest<br />

light upon the private and personal, as well as the official, side of the charac<br />

ter which this Biography endeavours to portray.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!