10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

857-59] SERVICES IN THEATRES 263<br />

God s glory. Do what we will, some things, which, as indivi<br />

duals, we do not like, cannot be stopped from working, and they<br />

had better work under proper control. They may be blessed of<br />

God ; if they are not of Him, they will come to 1<br />

naught.&quot;<br />

One such endeavour, neither authorised nor forbidden by<br />

the Bishop, was the plan for utilising the London theatres<br />

for Sunday evening services. At a Conference of Chris<br />

tians of all Evangelical Denominations/ held November<br />

22, 1859, Mr. Arthur Kinnaird named seven theatres, be<br />

sides other public buildings, which were bpen to them, and<br />

stated that<br />

&quot;<br />

the Bishop of London was in cordial har<br />

mony with them, and cared not whether Churchmen or<br />

Nonconformists conducted the services.&quot; This, however,<br />

was rashly spoken. The Bishop wrote, in answer to a<br />

correspondent, that he had grave doubts as to the wisdom<br />

of the movement, though he explained that his attitude<br />

must for the time be one of watchful neutrality. These<br />

services in theatres became, in 1860, the subject of pro<br />

longed debate in the House of Lords, when the Bishop, in<br />

answer to a widely-supported remonstrance or challenge<br />

from Lord Dungannon, expressed his determination not<br />

to interfere with an effort which, however irregular, had<br />

undoubtedly been productive of much good. Lord<br />

Shaftesbury, in a long and eloquent speech, described the<br />

impressive and orderly character of the services which had<br />

been held in the theatres each Sunday evening, in the<br />

presence of immense multitudes of the poorest classes.<br />

Bishop Tait followed :-<br />

It had been supposed,&quot; he said, &quot;that this was a public<br />

movement which the heads of the Church were officially<br />

sanctioning. The facts were altogether different. It was a<br />

movement of certain private individuals, who, feeling deeply the<br />

responsibility cast on them as Christian men, determined to try<br />

1<br />

Charge of 1858, pp. 89-91.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!