10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LIFE OF ARCHBISHOP TAIT [CH. xiv.<br />

&quot;We perceive,&quot; they said, &quot;(i) That the electing clergy were<br />

a decided minority of the clergy of the Diocese ; (2) That an<br />

equal number voted for and against the proceeding to an elec<br />

tion ; (3) That some of those who opposed proceeding to an<br />

election recorded their refusal to receive a Bishop if he were<br />

consecrated as the result of so nearly balanced a vote. These<br />

considerations suggest to us the doubt whether there is, as yet,<br />

the proof which you have a right to require (i) That the canoni-<br />

city of the election is certain ; (2) That it will be recognised by<br />

the Metropolitan and Suffragans of the Province as canonical;<br />

(3) That it will be so recognised by<br />

the Church at home.<br />

&quot;We further notice that though a large majority of the lay<br />

communicants present voteo^ for the election, yet that they<br />

amounted only to twenty-nine, so small a proportion of the<br />

whole number of lay communicants in the Diocese that we<br />

doubt whether their vote can properly be taken as expressing<br />

the assent of the laity, more especially as we do not perceive<br />

that they pledged their order to make the needful provision for<br />

their Bishop. We advise you, therefore, to suspend your de<br />

cision until these important questions concerning your election<br />

shall have been completely answered. With earnest prayers to<br />

God to lead you in this matter to see and do His will, we remain,<br />

ever yours,<br />

C. T. CANTUAR.<br />

S. OXON.&quot;<br />

After further inquiry, however, the doubts of Arch<br />

bishop Longley and Bishop<br />

been set at rest, 1<br />

Wilberforce seem to have<br />

but, owing probably to the approaching<br />

Lambeth Conference, any actual decision in the matter<br />

was postponed.<br />

In the meantime Bishop Colenso had brought an action<br />

at law to secure the continuance of the income hitherto paid<br />

to him as Bishop of Natal by the Council of the Colonial<br />

Bishoprics Fund, and now withheld in consequence of his<br />

deposition. On November 6, 1866, Lord Romilly (Master<br />

of the Rolls) gave judgment in Bishop Colenso s favour,<br />

and in the course of it controverted some parts of the<br />

1<br />

Bishop Gray s Life t vol. ii. p. 304.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!