10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1860-64] &quot;ESSAYS AND RKVIKU S 277<br />

Although the echoes of this particular battle have no\v<br />

for many years been silent, the area of the strife was at the<br />

time so wide, and Bishop Tait s position<br />

in it was so<br />

peculiar and so prominent, that it is necessary to tell the<br />

story at some length.<br />

In February 1860 a volume of theological Essays by<br />

different authors was published under the colourless title<br />

of Essays and Reviews. The character and purpose of the<br />

volume were made clear in its short preface or<br />

ment,&quot; which ran as follows :-<br />

&quot;<br />

advertise<br />

&quot;<br />

It will readily be understood that the Authors of the ensuing<br />

Essays are responsible for their respective articles only. They<br />

have written in entire independence of each other, and without<br />

concert or comparison.<br />

&quot;The Volume, it is hoped, will be received as an attempt to<br />

illustrate the advantage derivable to the cause of religious and<br />

moral truth, from a free handling, in a becoming spirit, of<br />

subjects peculiarly liable to suffer by the repetition<br />

of conven<br />

tional language, and from traditional methods of treatment.&quot;<br />

The Essays were seven in number. The first was by<br />

Dr. Temple, Head Master of Rugby, its title being The<br />

Education of the World. The seventh was by Professor<br />

Jowett, On tJte Interpretation of Scripture. The other<br />

essayists were Dr. Rowland Williams, Professor Baden<br />

Powell, the Rev. H. B. Wilson, Mr. C. W. Goodwin, and<br />

the Rev. Mark Pattison.<br />

The volume awakened at first no very absorbing interest.<br />

In April a severe but discriminating review appeared in<br />

the Guardian, condemning the book as a whole, but<br />

drawing a marked distinction between the different essay<br />

ists, and specially exonerating Dr. Temple s essay from<br />

having given any just grounds of offence. Other criticisms<br />

which followed in less guarded terms 1 served chiefly to<br />

1<br />

Among these was a long and vigorous article in the Westminster Reviea.\<br />

which attracted great attention at the time. It has been commonly attributed<br />

to the pen of Mr. Frederic Harrison.<br />

LIBRARY ST. MARY S COLLEGE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!