10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

i86i-66] CONVOCATION PROCEEDINGS 349<br />

and was about to bring his Suffragan to trial. From the<br />

decision to be arrived at in that trial, some appeal, urged<br />

Bishop Tait, must surely lie, and the Archbishop, he<br />

thought, was now being called upon to take part in pre<br />

judging the very issue he might hereafter have to try.<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

I will never believe,&quot; he continued, that it was the intention<br />

of the letters patent, or whatever it is that clothes the Bishop of<br />

Capetown with authority, to make him so irresponsible that there<br />

should be no earthly appeal from his decision. . . . The Bishop<br />

of Oxford has very properly said that Bishops cannot be silent<br />

and express no opinion about the grievous errors that are brought<br />

before them. Of course we must express our opinion, but there<br />

on matters<br />

is a very great difference between expressing opinions<br />

of doctrine, in<br />

fulfilling our common Episcopal functions by<br />

preaching the Word of Truth and pointing it out to our clergy,<br />

and, on the other hand, sitting here in a judicial, or something<br />

very like a judicial, capacity. ... If in our desire to warn<br />

people we hurry into any decision now, we may perhaps destroy<br />

our ability to afford them that future and most effectual warning<br />

which it may be in our power to give them if we wait till the<br />

matter is brought before a properly constituted tribunal.&quot; 1<br />

The debate was adjourned, and next day, in the Bishop<br />

of London s absence, a long resolution was proposed by<br />

Bishop Sumner of Winchester, and carried, to the effect<br />

that while the book did, in the judgment of the Bishops,<br />

&quot;<br />

involve errors of the gravest and most dangerous char<br />

acter,&quot; they declined to take further action in the matter,<br />

inasmuch as the book was<br />

&quot;<br />

shortly<br />

the judgment of an Ecclesiastical Court&quot;<br />

to be submitted to<br />

It was already in process of being so submitted. On<br />

April nth, 1863, Bishop Gray landed at Capetown, and<br />

immediately announced that he was ready to do his duty<br />

by citing the Bishop of Natal to appear before him for<br />

trial. Formal<br />

k<br />

Articles of Accusation were in the next<br />

-<br />

Chronicle of Convocation, May 19, 1863, p. 1166.<br />

Ibid. May 20, 1863, p. 1205.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!