10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1834-41] STILL IN DOUBT 67<br />

In his letter to the Principal he says :-<br />

&quot;I shall without doubt offer myself as a candidate for the<br />

Chair, provided it shall appear on examination that I could con<br />

scientiously hold the situation, reserving to myself liberty of<br />

conscience, and the free and public exercise of my own mode of<br />

worship as a clergyman of the Church of England. ... I hope<br />

your friendship will attribute what I say on the subject of my<br />

opinions to my anxious desire to act in perfect fairness at the<br />

very outset in proposing myself to your kind consideration. I<br />

should be proud, indeed, to return to my old University as a<br />

Professor, but could never consent to do so by a compromise of<br />

my duty to the Church of England. I am the minister of that<br />

Church, and bound to uphold publicly her doctrine and discipline.&quot;<br />

Two days later, while the question of subscription still<br />

remained open, he writes thus to his brother :<br />

The -Rev. A. C. Tait to Mr. John Tait.<br />

&quot;BALLIOL COLL., n//z Feb. 1838.<br />

&quot; MY DEAR JOHN, I have just time before post to call your<br />

attention to what has struck me. There is a party in this Uni<br />

versity who have become somewhat famous of late (vide the last<br />

Edinburgh Review], persons who hold extremely High-Church<br />

doctrines about Episcopal authority, and who regard the Kirk<br />

of <strong>Scotland</strong> as the synagogue of Baal. With these it would be<br />

peculiarly hard if I was at all identified on the present occasion,<br />

as I have spent my breath and influence for a long time back in<br />

protesting against their (what I conceive to be) most dangerous<br />

and superstitious opinions. . . .&quot;<br />

With respect to the necessity of formal subscription,<br />

the answers which he received from Principal Macfarlane<br />

and Dr. M Gill, though personally they<br />

were most en<br />

couraging and laudatory, were quite uncompromising,<br />

both in their hostility to the Episcopalian system, and in<br />

their adherence, as of necessity, to the Calvinism which<br />

Tait had declared himself unable to accept. His Scotch<br />

friends, who naturally wished to see him again settled

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!