10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1860-64] CORRKSrONDKNCK WITH STANLEY 285<br />

&quot; MY<br />

The Bishop of London to Canon A. P. Stanley.<br />

&quot;LONDON HOUSE, February 18, 1861.<br />

DEAR STANLEY, In paragraph 3 of the Archbishop s<br />

letter, as given in the Times, there is a typographical error which<br />

materially<br />

*<br />

alters its tone. The word their is substituted for<br />

these. This shall be publicly corrected.<br />

&quot;<br />

If you read the letter with this alteration, you will see that<br />

the paper in question contains simply what I stated to you in<br />

the garden at Fulham as likely to appear. No allusion is made<br />

in the paper to any individual writer, and it is open for each to<br />

show that he is not responsible for what others have written, or<br />

for the general system which the public has put together from<br />

comparing the seven essays.<br />

&quot;<br />

Trust me that I have done in this matter what is best, and<br />

what was absolutely necessary.<br />

&quot;As to Temple s essay, I mentioned to you, that, in my judg<br />

ment, there is nothing in it, taken by itself, to which such a<br />

condemnation as that of the Archbishop s letter can apply.<br />

The same must be said of Pattison s. Jowett s has a deeply<br />

earnest tone about it. Those who are acquainted with his other<br />

writings will find far less to object to in this essay than in the<br />

Dissertations or Commentary.<br />

&quot; The book of the Essays and Reviews as a whole is what has<br />

excited so much feeling. Cannot the copartnery be dissolved ?<br />

Surely it is wrong to allow new editions of it as a whole to be<br />

appearing. The variety of names in that list of the whole Bench<br />

appended to the Archbishop s letter ought to convince you of<br />

the gravity of the occasion, of which no one but ourselves (the<br />

Bishops) can judge. I am confident that the course pursued<br />

has been the right one, and the kindest to the writers. I urged<br />

on both Jowett and Temple the duty of their each publishing<br />

something of a positive character, which would show that they<br />

are not to be confounded, say, with Baden Powell. I wish you<br />

could bring this about. Temple at least would have no difficulty<br />

in doing so. Yours ever,<br />

&quot;<br />

A. C. LONDON.&quot;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!