10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

358 LIFE OF ARCHBISHOP TAIT [CH. xm.<br />

this attack in a copious pamphlet 1 He had already<br />

declared his readiness to appear for trial before any com<br />

petent Court, whose proceedings should be conducted in<br />

accordance with English law, and he had undertaken, in<br />

such case, to raise no merely technical objection.<br />

appealed to the Queen<br />

He now<br />

in Council as to whether the<br />

deposition which had been pronounced was valid, and on<br />

March 2Oth, 1865, the Lord Chancellor pronounced judg<br />

ment in his favour, on grounds similar to those which had<br />

governed the decision in the Long case, 2<br />

namely, that the<br />

Letters Patent had exceeded their power in professing to<br />

confer coercive jurisdiction upon the Bishop of Capetown,<br />

and that, accordingly,<br />

&quot;<br />

the proceedings taken by the<br />

Bishop of Capetown, and the judgment or sentence pro<br />

nounced by him against the Bishop of Natal, are null and<br />

void in law.&quot;<br />

Bishop Colenso s alleged errors of doctrine had not, of<br />

course, come, in any shape, before the Court. 3 The ques<br />

tion referred to the judges was merely whether there had<br />

or had not been a legal trial and a legal deposition. They<br />

decided that there had not, and the Bishop of Natal<br />

immediately returned to his diocese, reiterating his claim<br />

to be tried, if at all, by some process known to English<br />

law, either ecclesiastical or civil. He landed at Durban<br />

on November 6th, 1865, and, in spite of opposition, resumed<br />

his ministerial work. Thereupon<br />

decision of the Bishops of the Province in Synod<br />

1 Remarks<br />

&quot;in accordance with the<br />

upon the Proceedings and Charge of the Bishop of Capetoivn.<br />

!<br />

See above, p. 350.<br />

!<br />

It is perhaps necessary to point out that the Judicial Committee of the<br />

Privy Council, which had adjudicated upon Bishop Colenso s petition, was<br />

not the much impugned Judicial Committee, &quot;constituted as a Court for<br />

hearing Ecclesiastical Appeals.&quot; The matter came before the Court as a<br />

purely civil case. The Court had to decide whether a certain citizen of the<br />

British Empire had or had not been wronged. The judges were the Lord<br />

Chancellor, Lord Cranworth, Lord Kingsdown, the Dean of Arches, and the<br />

Master of the Rolls.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!