10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3o8 LIFE OF ARCHBISHOP TAIT [CH. xn.<br />

&quot; MY<br />

Canon A. P. Stanley to the Bishop of London.<br />

&quot;<br />

6 GROSVENOR CRESCENT, July 6, 1861.<br />

DEAR BISHOP, I do not like to leave London without<br />

a few words on our late controversy.<br />

&quot; You told me in February that in three months I should recog<br />

nise the wisdom and propriety of the Episcopal signatures to the<br />

condemnation of the opinions of the Essayists. I need hardly<br />

say that anything which has happened since has only confirmed<br />

my original impression. The Episcopal censure instead of allay<br />

ing has immensely aggravated it. Convocation has not only not<br />

been prevented from debating,*but has disgraced the Church by<br />

the most extravagant folly in the course which it has pursued ;<br />

legal proceedings have not only not been prevented, but have<br />

been promoted on the express ground of the Episcopal letter.<br />

The only gainers have been the publishers and the extreme sec<br />

tion of the Essayists, who have reaped the greatest advantage<br />

from the indiscriminate character of the censure, and from the<br />

moral impossibility which it has created of a dissolution of com<br />

panionship between the different authors.<br />

&quot;<br />

I only refer to these consequences of what has been done as<br />

a reason for hoping better things in what remains to be done.<br />

&quot;<br />

I am quite unable to see why those Bishops who see no<br />

grave cause of complaint against the doctrines of the book (what<br />

ever they may think of its prudence) should not say so. Those<br />

with whom you have talked freely on these matters know per<br />

fectly well what your opinions were at the beginning of this year.<br />

Temple, Jowett, and Pattison you have, in private communica<br />

tion with me, entirely acquitted (so far as their essays are<br />

concerned) of any grave error; of the others (with the exception<br />

of Powell, if interpreted according to the unfavourable construc<br />

tion) there is none whose opinions V I am not now speaking of<br />

their style and temper, which are irrelevant) you can think more<br />

untenable within the Church than what you know of Arnold,<br />

Julius Hare, or the Bishop of St. David s.<br />

&quot; And<br />

yet up to this time no Bishop, except the Bishop of<br />

Lincoln, has ventured to say publicly that the opinions of any<br />

one of the essayists are compatible with the position of an<br />

English clergyman.<br />

&quot;<br />

I will not add anything more. You know that I, and those

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!