10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

Untitled - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 88 I, IKK OK ARCHBISHOP TAIT [CH. xiv.<br />

its opinion. Believe me to be, my dear Lord, yours very<br />

faithfully, A. C. LONDON.&quot;<br />

This letter rendered the prosecution of Bishop Gray s<br />

plan impossible. His Biography gives a vivid picture of<br />

the hurried consultations which took place the telegrams<br />

and journeys between Cuddesdon and London - - the<br />

resolution arrived at to revert, if possible, to the plan of<br />

consecrating in <strong>Scotland</strong> the successive consent, recon<br />

sideration, and refusal by the Scottish Bishops the un<br />

successful endeavour to obtain after all a mandate from<br />

the Crown - - and the ultimate resolve that there was<br />

nothing<br />

for it but to hold the consecration in South<br />

Africa. 1 The following extracts from the innumerable<br />

letters which have been preserved, and from the Convo<br />

cation Debates, will give a sufficient idea of the line<br />

adhered to by Bishop Tait throughout the stormy and<br />

complicated controversy. He received from Bishop Gray<br />

a long reply 2 to the public letter of January 2Oth, quoted<br />

above. In the course of it Bishop Gray wrote :-<br />

&quot; You have asked me, in the name of the Church of England,<br />

a question, to which in this letter I give my answer. In return<br />

I venture, in the name of the same Church, and in my own, as<br />

Metropolitan of a province which you have deeply and grievously<br />

wounded by your whole course of proceedings in this matter, as<br />

I have shown in my published Statement, to ask you whether<br />

you do hold communion with Dr. Colenso, or not? Whether<br />

you regard him as the representative Bishop<br />

of the Church of<br />

England in Natal, or not? Whether he is entitled, in his char<br />

acter of teacher, to speak in the name of this great<br />

and ancient<br />

Church, or not? Vague phrases about disapproving of his<br />

teaching evade the question, and do not meet the necessities of<br />

we received<br />

this crisis. The issue at stake is simply this : Have<br />

1<br />

Bishop Gray s Life, vol. ii. pp. 384-443.<br />

2 This letter, which afterwards formed the body of a pamphlet, was the<br />

joint handiwork of Bishops Gray, Hamilton, Wilberforce, Cotterill, and<br />

others. See Bishop Gray s Life, vol. ii. p. 385.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!