01.06.2013 Views

Image of the Day

Image of the Day

Image of the Day

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

But <strong>the</strong>y are deeply concerned about <strong>the</strong> Federal deficit, as are Mr. Obama<br />

and congressional democrats.<br />

But again, why? The web <strong>of</strong> convenient fictions currently in play<br />

amongst both democrats and republicans in Washington—corporate tax<br />

cuts promote economic growth and job creation, government spending<br />

‘crowds out’ more productive private sector spending, ‘excessive’<br />

government debt will cause a financial market rebellion (bond vigilantes)<br />

and handing social insurance programs to private market pr<strong>of</strong>iteers is<br />

beneficial to <strong>the</strong> insured, are all demonstrably nonsense with only a<br />

cursory look at ‘<strong>the</strong> evidence.’<br />

Effective corporate tax rates are <strong>the</strong> lowest in modern history and job<br />

creation, even before <strong>the</strong> economic calamity began in 2008, is <strong>the</strong> weakest<br />

since <strong>the</strong> 1930s. As global warming caused by largely private production<br />

and <strong>the</strong> predatory, dysfunctional private sector demonstrate on a daily<br />

basis, <strong>the</strong> ‘efficiencies’ <strong>of</strong> private production come from cost shifting, not<br />

by levels <strong>of</strong> human motivation intrinsic to capitalism. As QE is<br />

demonstrating, <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve can control both short and long term<br />

interests rates—<strong>the</strong> ‘bond vigilantes’ are only in control when <strong>the</strong>y provide<br />

cover for private interests. And Barack Obama didn’t choose <strong>the</strong> ‘least<br />

bad’ option with his healthcare ‘reform,’ he chose <strong>the</strong> private option to<br />

which he is ideologically committed.<br />

Without apparent irony, <strong>the</strong>se convenient fictions are straight from<br />

<strong>the</strong> IMF (International Monetary Fund) and World Bank playbooks circa<br />

1980. While couched in <strong>the</strong> language <strong>of</strong> ‘economic development,’ IMF<br />

policies were / are extractive, designed to exert control over political<br />

economies and were / are tools <strong>of</strong> economic imperialism. The ‘austerity’<br />

<strong>of</strong> IMF policies, cutting social spending to divert funds to service external<br />

debt, was rarely accompanied by even <strong>the</strong> pretense it benefited those<br />

whose social insurance programs were being looted. Cut to Mr. Obama<br />

and Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi mirroring <strong>the</strong> Vietnam Warism that<br />

to streng<strong>the</strong>n Social Security we must weaken it. Welcome to neo-Colonial<br />

America.<br />

Also without apparent irony, <strong>the</strong> neo-Keynesian wing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Democratic Party claims to have correctly analyzed current economic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!