01.06.2013 Views

Image of the Day

Image of the Day

Image of the Day

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

chided <strong>the</strong> FDA for inadequate oversight and even failing to meet its own<br />

inspection goals. According to <strong>the</strong> report, “FDA”s sampling program is<br />

limited in scope, is not effectively implemented, and does not fully use <strong>the</strong><br />

capabilities <strong>of</strong> FDA’s laboratories.”<br />

For example, in 2009, <strong>the</strong> FDA tested only 0.1 percent <strong>of</strong> seafood<br />

imports for drug residues. When <strong>the</strong>y do test, <strong>the</strong>y only test for 16 drugs,<br />

whereas Canada tests for 40, some European countries test for 50, and<br />

Japan tests for 57. In recent years, <strong>the</strong> U.S. lagged behind o<strong>the</strong>r nations in<br />

starting to test for drugs. The EU began testing for chloramphenicol and<br />

nitr<strong>of</strong>uran in 2001, but <strong>the</strong> U.S. did not do so until 2002 and 2004,<br />

respectively. In 2003, <strong>the</strong> EU began testing for malachite green, but <strong>the</strong><br />

U.S. waited until 2005 to do so.<br />

Once <strong>the</strong> FDA rejects a shipment <strong>of</strong> seafood, “<strong>the</strong>y don't destroy <strong>the</strong><br />

product,” explains Engle. “So it can go out on <strong>the</strong> ship and come in on<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r port. And because <strong>the</strong>re is such a small percentage being tested,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n when <strong>the</strong>y go to ano<strong>the</strong>r port like that, it's equally unlikely to be<br />

caught. So that's what happens. They call it port swapping.” She<br />

concludes, “FDA is just simply not catching things, and <strong>the</strong> system is not<br />

set up to catch it.”<br />

The U.S. catfish industry was so fed up with <strong>the</strong> FDA’s lack <strong>of</strong><br />

oversight that it lobbied to have catfish inspected by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Agriculture instead. The USDA requires equivalency, says Engle,<br />

meaning that imported catfish (including pangasius) are held to <strong>the</strong> same<br />

standards as domestically raised catfish. “Why should we have different<br />

standards for our US growers and... an imported product?” Engle asks.<br />

But even though catfish oversight was transferred to <strong>the</strong> USDA in <strong>the</strong><br />

2008 farm bill, <strong>the</strong> change was never implemented. Engle calls it a<br />

"political battle” between states with many seafood importers and those<br />

with a domestic catfish industry. Vietnam joined in <strong>the</strong> fight too,<br />

threatening to boycott U.S. beef. “Why would <strong>the</strong>y be worried about it<br />

unless <strong>the</strong>y realized <strong>the</strong>y couldn't meet <strong>the</strong> US safety standards right<br />

now?" Engle points out. “The battle was not about safety for US<br />

consumers or even safety for Vietnamese consumers. It's really a shame.”<br />

Read More

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!