01.06.2013 Views

Image of the Day

Image of the Day

Image of the Day

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The cable reports that “Israel has urged <strong>the</strong> IAEA to view <strong>the</strong> forum<br />

as ‘a one-time educational event’” with a purely “intellectual” outcome.<br />

The Israelis objected to <strong>the</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Arab<br />

League as observers, as "not consistent with <strong>the</strong> learning process".<br />

When agreement could not be reached on <strong>the</strong> form <strong>the</strong> forum would<br />

take, it was postponed. The idea was revived by <strong>the</strong> US in 2007 in an<br />

attempt to “head <strong>of</strong>f” <strong>the</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> an “Israeli Nuclear Threat” (INT)<br />

item on <strong>the</strong> agenda for that year's IAEA General Conference. The US<br />

consistently opposes language in IAEA, NPT and UN resolutions on<br />

nuclear issues in <strong>the</strong> Middle East that refers specifically to Israel, even<br />

though Israel is <strong>the</strong> only nuclear weapons power in <strong>the</strong> region.<br />

The INT item was proposed by <strong>the</strong> Arab group <strong>of</strong> IAEA member<br />

states, partly due to <strong>the</strong>ir frustration with <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> progress on<br />

establishing a Middle East Nuclear Weapon Free Zone, and called upon<br />

Israel to accede to <strong>the</strong> NPT and place all its nuclear facilities under<br />

comprehensive IAEA safeguards.<br />

According to a July 2007 cable from <strong>the</strong> US Ambassador to <strong>the</strong><br />

IAEA, Israeli Ambassador Israel Michaeli agreed that “US pressure to<br />

agree to a Forum” could be a “joint <strong>of</strong> leverage” to persuade Egypt to use<br />

its influence within <strong>the</strong> Arab group to drop <strong>the</strong> proposed INT agenda item.<br />

The cable reports that Michaeli said that <strong>the</strong> Israeli “government<br />

would not be ‘very happy’ about a Forum” but if it was “based on known<br />

elements meaning <strong>the</strong> agreed 2004 agenda, Israel could countenance it”.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> end, a forum on "Experience <strong>of</strong> Possible Relevance to <strong>the</strong><br />

Creation <strong>of</strong> a Nuclear-Weapons-Free Zone in <strong>the</strong> Middle East" took place<br />

last year. The forum produced a document that concluded with four<br />

general proposals for taking <strong>the</strong> process forward, but no specific or<br />

binding measures.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> a Middle East Nuclear Weapon Free Zone<br />

would require Israel to declare and ultimately give up its nuclear arsenal,<br />

Israel and <strong>the</strong> US have preferred to focus on <strong>the</strong> threat allegedly posed by<br />

Iran’s nuclear program.<br />

While Israel’s <strong>of</strong>ficial “red line” is Iran having <strong>the</strong> ability to make<br />

what Israel deems to be enough weapons grade uranium to make a bomb,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!