01.06.2013 Views

Image of the Day

Image of the Day

Image of the Day

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> UN Charter should give us reason to pause. It expressly prohibits<br />

<strong>the</strong> threat or use <strong>of</strong> force by one state against ano<strong>the</strong>r. One argument that<br />

proponents for drone attacks use is that since <strong>the</strong> attacks are being carried<br />

out on militants and insurgents, and mostly in regions where <strong>the</strong> rule <strong>of</strong><br />

law has broken down, <strong>the</strong> phrase “state” doesn’t apply and <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

nullifies this section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Charter. But this argument is dubious at best. If<br />

it were Iran, China, or Russia engaging in this type <strong>of</strong> behavior closer to<br />

US shores, say in Central or South America, <strong>the</strong>re is no doubt that <strong>the</strong> US<br />

government would be in an uproar over <strong>the</strong> legality, and morality, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

use.<br />

Compounding all <strong>of</strong> this is <strong>the</strong> controversial policy known as “<strong>the</strong><br />

double tap.” This involves striking an initial target and <strong>the</strong>n following up,<br />

in quick succession, with repeated attacks on <strong>the</strong> same site as people arrive<br />

to give aid to <strong>the</strong> original victims. There are reports that innocent<br />

bystanders and non-combatants have been intentionally killed as a result.<br />

There are also reports that funerals have been deliberately hit by targeted<br />

drone strikes as well. In almost any o<strong>the</strong>r circumstances <strong>the</strong>se events<br />

would be recognized for what <strong>the</strong>y are. War crimes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest order.<br />

But somehow, for <strong>the</strong> US, <strong>the</strong>y only raise “contentious legal questions” to<br />

quote <strong>the</strong> New York Times.<br />

16 civilians (including 9 children) were murdered in cold blood in<br />

Afghanistan. For that, Sgt. Bales is facing <strong>the</strong> possible loss <strong>of</strong> his life.<br />

America’s drone policy alone has reportedly killed between 474 and 881<br />

civilians in <strong>the</strong> region, including 176 children. For this, no one is on trial.<br />

But to even talk <strong>of</strong> war crimes in Afghanistan is a farce. The whole<br />

war, in addition to being undeclared and unfunded, can be considered as a<br />

war crime. That is, if one chooses to respect <strong>the</strong> principles put forth at <strong>the</strong><br />

International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg and <strong>the</strong> founding charter <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> UN. To talk about <strong>the</strong> individual atrocities committed by one lonely<br />

Sergeant (if that, indeed, is <strong>the</strong> case. 2 US soldiers are testifying for <strong>the</strong><br />

Government under immunity) while ignoring <strong>the</strong> war crimes committed<br />

by a Nation, screams <strong>of</strong> hypocrisy and a double standard <strong>of</strong> justice.<br />

After 11 years <strong>of</strong> fighting, <strong>the</strong> US has now been in Afghanistan<br />

longer than <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union. 2,000 soldiers have died in combat, with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!