17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ENVY<br />

first series of experiments, the box method, the food was placed in a<br />

wooden container with a lid. This box was made available at short<br />

intervals throughout the day. It was rare for both chimpanzees to try to<br />

get hold of the titbit.<br />

In the second and more prolonged series of experiments, the researchers<br />

used a wooden chute which was fixed to the side of the cage at a<br />

certain time every day. During the daily period of experiment, the<br />

experimenter let the titbit roll down the chute into the cage at ten- or<br />

thirty.:second intervals. A signal drew both the chimpanzees' attention to<br />

the fact that they were about to be fed. During the first series of tests, the<br />

male, Pan, first came and took the titbit. The female, Josie, sat contentedly<br />

by, obviously assenting to Pan's right to take everything he<br />

wanted. Pan, on the other hand, according to Yerkes, was quite obviously<br />

not at ease over this one-sided taking of the food. 'He talked low and<br />

questioningly to himself in a manner never before noticed. '<br />

Pan went on asserting his precedence until the seventh experiment.<br />

But then Josie snatched the titbit out of the chute before Pan's outstretched<br />

hand reached it. 'Without show of resentment he left the chute<br />

and she took possession. He neither returned nor gave sign of restlessness<br />

or dissatisfaction.' Upon which Yerkes asks: 'The aforementioned<br />

conversation-like vocalization may have been an intimation of conscience<br />

or of deference toward a consort. Was it?'<br />

The following day the female was able to take the food out of the chute<br />

without interference from Pan although he evidently wanted it. On the<br />

third day the picture was different: both chimpanzees approached the<br />

chute expectantly. Josie took control and Pan quietly walked away. After<br />

taking one bite, however, Josie left the chute, hurried across to the male<br />

and brought him back to the feeding-place where she presented herself to<br />

him sexually, but without success. But with the female beside him,<br />

visibly eager to have the food, Pan stood in front of the chute and took the<br />

next bits of banana that came down.<br />

At the third experiment, however, she again forestalled him. Pan<br />

immediately went away and did not return to the feeding-place. That day<br />

Josie got nine of the ten portions presented during the experiment. The<br />

next day the male tried once more to take a titbit. Josie screamed at him,<br />

and during the following days she took the food almost always alone and<br />

without interference from Pan.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!