17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE PSYCHOWGY OF INGRATITUDE 205<br />

the viewpoint of merit, has the advantage of having been first in the field<br />

of benevolence. (Significantly, some primitive peoples have succeeded<br />

in evolving a practice and ethic of giving that eliminates the problem of<br />

priority in giving.) Kant considers that gratitude is not a mere opportunist<br />

maxim to secure a further benefit, but that the respect due to a<br />

person on account of his benefaction to us is a direct requirement of the<br />

moral law, in other words, a duty. But he goes even further:<br />

'But gratitude must be seen as a sacred duty, as one, that is, whose<br />

infringement ... may destroy the very principle of the moral desire to do<br />

good. For that moral object is sacred in respect of which an obligation<br />

can never be fully redeemed by an equivalent act. '<br />

If Kant sets so high a value on gratitude, because it is not humanly<br />

possible ever fully to requite the benefactor, it is surely because he<br />

sensed the social discord, the chronic envy and resentment, that must<br />

arise in a society where envy, and hence ingratitude, came to be sanctioned<br />

as the accepted response. The moral obligation of gratitude thus<br />

indirectly inhibits envious feelings of aggression. Without such an inhibition-exerted<br />

upon the individual by the cultural ethos, by the<br />

axioms of decency and by religion-there would be a danger that<br />

unconsidered benefactions in a society might have altogether unexpected<br />

consequences.<br />

Kant also shows the frame of mind in which the duty of gratitude<br />

should be performed and the manner of its performance:<br />

The lowest degree is to render equal services to the benefactor, should he<br />

be able to receive them (if still living), and if not, to extend them to others;<br />

not to regard a benefaction received as a burden of which one would be glad<br />

to be relieved (because the recipient stands one step below his patron, so<br />

that his pride is wounded); but to accept the occasion of it as a moral<br />

blessing, i.e., as a given opportunity to pledge this virtue of human love<br />

[gratitude] which represents both the sincerity of the benevolent mentality<br />

and the tenderness of benevolence (attention to the finest nuance of this in<br />

the concept of duty), thus cultivating human love. 19<br />

Most of us know people who find it almost impossible to accept help, a<br />

kindness, a present or a benefaction. Psychiatry has described extreme<br />

19 Op. cit., pp. 312f.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!