17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

214<br />

Envy among the Greeks<br />

ENVY AS THE SUBJECT OF PHILOSOPHY<br />

In December 1872, Nietzsche discusses in Greek Philosophy and Other<br />

Essays what he describes as Homer's contest. He suggests that nothing<br />

so much distinguishes the Greek world of antiquity from our own as its<br />

recognition of the agonistic element, the fight and joy in victory. This<br />

serves to explain the difference in tone between individual ethical<br />

concepts, for example those of Eris and of envy. The whole of Greek<br />

antiquity shows a view of resentment and envy entirely different from<br />

our own, hence the predicates resentment and envy were not only<br />

applicable to the nature of the wicked Eris, but also to the other goddess,<br />

good Eris. Nietzsche writes:<br />

The Greek is envious and conceives of this quality not as a blemish, but<br />

as the effect of a beneficent deity. What a gulf of ethical judgment between<br />

us and him! Because he is envious he also feels, with every superfluity of<br />

honour, riches, splendour and fortune, the envious eye of a god resting on<br />

himself, and he fears this envy: in this case the latter reminds him of the<br />

transitoriness of every human lot: he dreads his very happiness and,<br />

sacrificing the best of it, he bows before the divine envy.41<br />

Nietzsche next supposes that this conception did not lead to estrangement<br />

between the Greek and his gods, but rather only to his renouncing<br />

all competition with them, so that he was impelled into jealous competition<br />

with every other living being, and even with the dead whose<br />

fame alone could excite consuming envy in the living. Nietzsche's<br />

interpretation of the institution of ostracism is almost the same as the<br />

argument used in America in the twentieth century to justify anti-trust<br />

laws; an institution, that is, which, by banning or silencing the greatest,<br />

safely restores competition among a number of the less great.<br />

'The original sense of this peculiar institution however is not that of a<br />

safety-valve but that of a stimulant. The all-excelling individual was to be<br />

removed in order that the contest of forces might reawaken .... ,42<br />

The basic assumptions of these aphorisms in Human, All Too Human<br />

devoted to envy might be summed up as follows: Envy and jealousy, 'the<br />

41 Friedrich Nietzsche, Collected Works, London, 1910, Vol. II, pp. 55--6.<br />

42 Op. cit., Vol. 7, p. 57.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!