17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 ENVY AS SEEN BY THE SOCIAL SCIENCES<br />

right to, but simply with the desirability of, what is denied; it is also a matter<br />

of indifference whether the asset is denied him because a third party owns<br />

it, or whether even its loss or renunciation by the latter would fail to procure<br />

itforhim.6<br />

Jealousy or envy?<br />

Simmel's definition needs greater precision: the expression 'jealousy'<br />

should be restricted to an asset upon which there is a legitimate claim,<br />

even if the jealous man is subjectively mistaken about his possible loss of<br />

that asset. A child in a family undoubtedly has a true a priori claim to its<br />

parents' kindness, help and love, yet it may be tormented by jealousy of<br />

its siblings if it only believes it isn't getting enough. Conversely, the<br />

husband whose wife is estranged from him has a right to claim her<br />

affections even though, seen objectively, her alienation is genuine.<br />

Simmel's final observation is wholly correct, namely, that the envious<br />

man, in certain circumstances, does not even want to have the coveted<br />

asset, nor could he enjoy it, but would find it unbearable that another<br />

should do so. He becomes ill with annoyance over someone else's private<br />

yacht although he has never wished to board a ship in his life.<br />

Simmel clarifies this further:<br />

Jealousy ... is determined in its inner direction and tone by the fact that a<br />

possession is withheld from us because it is held by another, and that were<br />

this to cease, it would at once become ours: the feelings of the envious man<br />

turn rather upon the possession, those of the jealous man upon the possessor.<br />

It is possible to envy a man's fame without oneself having any<br />

pretensions to fame; but one is jealous of him if one believes that one is<br />

equally or more deserving of it. What embitters and corrodes the jealous<br />

man is a kind of emotional fiction-however unjustified and senselessthat<br />

the other has, so to speak, taken the fame away from him. 7<br />

To continue with the example of fame, there is a further distinction to<br />

be made: if there is only one foremost literary prize and one poet has<br />

6 G. Simmel, Soziologie. Untersuchungen aber die Formen der Vergesellschaftung,<br />

Munich and Leipzig, 2nd ed., 1922, p. 210.<br />

7 Op. cit., pp. 210-11.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!