17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GEORG SIMMEL ON ENVY 115<br />

diminished or relatively contained in a society having a maximum or a<br />

minimum of points of social contact.<br />

Georg Simmel on envy<br />

In Chapter 4 of his Sociology, which is concerned with conflict, Georg<br />

Simmel investigates the phenomenon of envy, which he sees as<br />

contained within the concepts of hatred, jealousy and ill-will. Like so<br />

many authors, Simmel is immediately confronted by terminological<br />

ambiguity:<br />

Finally, there is a fact, apparently of merely individual importance, yet in<br />

reality very significant sociologically, which may link extreme violence of<br />

antagonistic excitement, to close proximity: jealousy. Popular usage is not<br />

unequivocal in regard to this term, often failing to distinguish it from envy.<br />

As we have already seen, Simmel here underrates the precision of the<br />

German language (as also of English and French). The big dictionaries,<br />

already available in his day, could have given him a clue. Simmel<br />

continues:<br />

Both affects are undoubtedly of the greatest importance in the formation<br />

of human relations. In both, an asset is involved whose attainment or<br />

preservation is impeded by a third party, either truly or symbolically. Where<br />

attainment is concerned, we should speak of envy, and where preservation,<br />

rather of jealousy; in this the semantic differentiation of the words is in<br />

itself, of course, quite meaningless and of importance only for the distinction<br />

of the psycho-sociological processes.<br />

Here I would not agree with Simmel unconditionally: the use of the<br />

words is not incidental, as we have already shown in Chapter 2. Proverbial<br />

lore, as well as the literature of different cultures, has, over the<br />

course of centuries, ranged so much precise knowledge under the distinct<br />

concepts 'jealousy' and 'envy' that we should retain the existing<br />

terminology. On the whole Simmel, too, adheres to tradition:<br />

It is peculiar to the man described as jealous that the subject believes he<br />

has a rightful claim to possession, whereas envy is concerned not with the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!