17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

290 THE SENSE OF JUSTICE AND THE IDEA OF EQUALITY<br />

The Labour Government has now declared itself opposed to this<br />

system, which already has been either partially abolished or watered<br />

down, and this, among other things, because it has become apparent that<br />

the utopian ideas of 1944 are not the way to the egalitarian heaven.<br />

Inequality of opportunity as an alibi<br />

In 1954 a study was published in Britain (based, among other things, on<br />

a questionnaire sent to ten thousand adults) on the subject of social<br />

mobility, edited by D. V. Glass. In this book developments were already<br />

apparent which were to be carried through to their conclusion a few years<br />

later by a young sociologist, Michael Young, in his penetrating book The<br />

Rise of the Meritocracy. 17 The reactions it aroused can be seen from a<br />

review of Glass's work in the leftist weekly, the then New Statesman and<br />

Nation. The reviewer asked: '. . . within a couple of generations there<br />

may be "perfect mobility," except for the few attending fee-paying<br />

schools-if there are any left. But what will happen then? What will<br />

equal opportunity really mean?'18 For, as D. V. Glass pointed out, the<br />

threefold system of grammar, technical and modern secondary schools<br />

did little to equalize and share out opportunities of mobility:<br />

On the contrary, the more efficient the selection procedure, the more<br />

evident those disadvantages are likely to become. Outside of the public<br />

schools, it will be the grammar schools which will furnish the new elite, an<br />

elite apparently much less assailable because it is selected for 'measured<br />

intelligence.' The selection process will tend to reinforce the prestige of<br />

occupations already high in social status and to divide the population into<br />

streams which many may come to regard-indeed, already regard-as<br />

distinct as sheep and goats.<br />

What comes next is Glass's key sentence:<br />

Not to have been to a grammar school will be a more serious disqualification<br />

than in the past, when social inequality in the educational<br />

17 D. V. Glass (ed.), Social Mobility in Britain, London, 1954. M. Young, The Rise of<br />

the Meritocracy. An Essay on Education and Equality, London, 1958.<br />

18 A. Curle, writing in The New Statesman and Nation, August 14, 1954.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!