17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NEW TESTAMENT ETHICS AND THE MODERN WORLD 159<br />

religion, the privileged classes and the priest who serves them see the<br />

individual's positively or negatively privileged social position as in some<br />

way religiously deserved, and only the forms of legitimizing the fortunate<br />

position change. ,29<br />

To draw the simplistic conclusion from these views-in the sense of<br />

Marxism, perhaps-that religion is exploited by the upper classes to<br />

provide opium for the lower, would be to ignore what we have repeatedly<br />

shown to be imperative in any society: to make discrepancies in status<br />

emotionally tolerable to the individual and capable of being rationalized.<br />

Systems of belief designed to control envy might be despised as social·<br />

opium were it possible to demonstrate that the definitive elimination of<br />

certain economic conditions relating to property, class, etc. would eradicate<br />

mutual envy from this world. But this cannot be done.<br />

It would seem more probable that the social need to achieve control<br />

over the worst problems of envy in human co-existence has brought<br />

about the reorientation of existing systems of religion so as to legitimize<br />

noticeable differences in individual circumstances in the interests of<br />

social peace. Thus, as has repeatedly been seen, the American cultural<br />

ethos, the popular mentality in the nineteenth century, created, quite<br />

independently of religious conceptions but in conjunction with them, a<br />

myth of the successful man which, much to the distress of the social<br />

critic, made inequalities emotionally tolerable. It would, however, be<br />

wrong to assume that individual authors or other interested parties had<br />

conjured up a myth and imposed it upon public opinion in order to<br />

legitimize and protect economic inequality. In many cases, rather, the<br />

existence of such an ideology alone permitted a mode of behaviour<br />

leading to inequality of achievement in business. At least it would seem<br />

probable that the human qualities and modes of behaviour requisite for<br />

the settlement and domination of the North American continent had<br />

helped to produce an ideology capable of legitimizing a state of<br />

progressive inequality.<br />

New Testament ethics and the modern world<br />

The ethic taught by the New Testament sought to secure differentiated<br />

human existence in a world full of envious people and unlikely to evolve<br />

29 Max Weber, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tiibingen, 1925, Vol. 1, p. 281.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!