17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

252 POLITICS AND THE APPEASEMENT OF ENVY<br />

justice, does not want a miner to compare himself with a fitter, a farm<br />

labourer with a boilermaker. Both men, he writes, 'have equal reason to<br />

compare themselves with clerks or businessmen or Members of Parliament.<br />

,24 Indeed, 'the poorest pensioner is entitled to a sense of relative<br />

deprivation based on the inequality between himself and the richest<br />

man.' Runciman believes that 'the poorest appear to be entitled to a<br />

greater magnitude of relative deprivation than the evidence shows them<br />

to feel. ' For instance, surveys in Britain have shown people to care much<br />

less for steeply progressive income taxes than present tax laws assume. 25<br />

Runciman, finding less envy than expected, argues that his model of a<br />

socially just society would not require people to be more disposed to<br />

envy.26 This I doubt. It is an ominous sign that egalitarians now wish<br />

people to develop a keener sense of envious mortification than they<br />

normally have lest they cease to care for reforms. As we have shown from<br />

the start, concepts such as relative deprivation, though useful in some<br />

types of empirical research, have helped to repress the facts regarding<br />

envy. Our book tries to show what life would ultimately be like in a<br />

society of 'uninhibited reference group choice. '<br />

24 W. G. Runciman, Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, London and Berkeley,<br />

1966, pp. 270 ff.<br />

2S Op. cit., pp. 90 ff.<br />

26 Op. cit., p. 280.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!