17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RESENTMENT 217<br />

fatigable and insatiable in its outbursts against the happy, and equally so in<br />

disguises for revenge, in pretexts for revenge: when will they really reach<br />

their final, fondest, most sublime triumph of revenge? At that time, doubtless,<br />

when they succeed in pushing their own misery, indeed all misery<br />

there is, into the consciousness of the happy; so that the latter begin one day<br />

to .be ashamed of their happiness, and perchance say to themselves when<br />

they meet, 'It is a shame to be happy! There is too much misery! ,50<br />

There can be no doubt that Nietzsche here forecasts one of the most<br />

momentous developments of the twentieth century, which alone made<br />

possible effusions such as Paul Tournier's on the subject of true and false<br />

guilt-feelings. Or again one need only recall the innumerable masochistic<br />

writings in which Westerners indulge in shame and self-indictment<br />

because of the inequality between them and the so-called developing<br />

countries. Nietzsche sees this development as the biggest and most<br />

fateful of misunderstandings. The world in which the happy and successful<br />

begin to doubt their right to happiness, he regards as a world turned<br />

upside down. Nietzsche follows this by writing about what he calls the<br />

tremendous historic mission of the ascetic priest in a society. The priest<br />

acts as a deflector of resentment by telling the sufferer searching for a<br />

cause, an instigator or, to be exact, a guilty instigator, of his suffering,<br />

that certainly there is a guilty person, but that person is the sufferer<br />

himself. 51 Nietzsche believes that even if this were objectively false, it<br />

would still deflect resentment from action dangerous to society. A<br />

Marxist would here reproach Nietzsche with accepting religion solely as<br />

an opiate for the people in order to avoid class war; but seen against the<br />

background of this book, Nietzsche's view, devoid of religious sentiment,<br />

may have been realistic in that fundamentally no society can be effective<br />

or even attain a tolerable social climate, if it does not possess that kind of<br />

belief that will bring the underprivileged man to see, if not himself, then<br />

the effect of blind chance as a cause of his condition. We have already<br />

seen the dead ends in which primitive peoples stagnate as a result of<br />

conceiving that every misfortune or loss of asset experienced by the<br />

individual is deliberately engineered by a fellow tribesman.<br />

Nietzsche examines resentment in many forms, and also its physiological<br />

manifestations, as a reactive and enduring mode of behaviour.<br />

50 Op. cit., Vol. 13, p. 160.<br />

51 Op. cit., Vol. 13, p. 162.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!