17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

118 ENVY AS SEEN BY THE SOCIAL SCIENCES<br />

cated here is the psycho-social dynamic, the source of numerous socially<br />

or culturally derived regulations usually known as 'sumptuary laws. '<br />

Sociology of sexual jealousy<br />

The American sociologist Kingsley Davis analyses jealousy and sexual<br />

possession as examples for his functional theory of society. He thinks it<br />

may seem surprising that an individual emotion, something purely<br />

psychological, might contribute to an understanding of culture and<br />

social organization, yet he attributes to jealousy a function not only in<br />

the individual's emotional state, but also in his immediate linkage to<br />

social organization:<br />

. . . the manifestations of jealousy are determined by the normative and<br />

institutional structure of the given society. This structure defines the<br />

situations in which jealousy shows itself and regulates the form of its<br />

expression. It follows that unless jealous behaviour is observed in different<br />

cultures, unless a comparative point of view is adopted, it cannot be<br />

intelligently comprehended as a human phenomenon. 9<br />

The same applies to envy. Curiously enough, Davis concerns himself<br />

with it only incidentally, seeing it, in contrast to jealousy, not as the<br />

attitude of a possessor but as that of an observer or potential rival who<br />

would like to have what another has without envisaging any possibility of<br />

getting it away from him. Envy, he says, cannot assert itself simultaneously<br />

with jealousy in the same person, since the latter emotion<br />

presupposes a certain right. Other authors, as we have seen, believe in<br />

the possibility of a blend of jealousy and envy, each intensifying the<br />

other. Davis sees in envy an inevitable phenomenon of all social life.<br />

Anyone who has not got everything that he has been led to regard as<br />

desirable will be envious of others. 'But since envy usually goes contrary<br />

to the established distribution of this world's valuables, it is<br />

frowned upon by the group as a whole. ' 10<br />

Davis shows in detail how wrong those writers were who have seen in<br />

sexual jealousy the expression of a completely physical state of affairs.<br />

9 K. Davis,HumanSociety, NewYork,1949, p. 175.<br />

lOOp. cit., p. 182.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!