17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

258 IN PRAISE OF POVERTY<br />

High incomes 'socially just' in the socialist society of scarcity,<br />

'unjust' in the affluent society of 'capitalism'<br />

For several years now, both in America and in European countries,<br />

certain young people have adopted a strange attitude of defiance. A short<br />

conversation is enough to detect in them a persistent, smouldering<br />

feeling: their own society, or Western society in general, does not suit<br />

them. They feel ill at ease because it is comfortable; and this is because<br />

not everyone is equally well or badly off, and because others are too well<br />

off. There are some, in fact, who are very badly off but seldom, as it<br />

happens, the person I have been talking to. His father may even be rich,<br />

and this only makes matters worse. It is the Weltschmerz of the egalitarian<br />

temperament caught up in a reality which takes some account of their<br />

problem, but not enough. Often they may be too well off to be able to<br />

take themselves as an example, asking me rather to compare the lot of<br />

certain unfortunate people with the luxury of some highly paid individual.<br />

But seldom, if ever, are the Kennedys mentioned, or trade union<br />

leaders, successful authors, film stars, or the instant celebrities of show<br />

business. Exception is frequently taken to the incomes of famous doctors,<br />

business executives and industrialists. When challenged to name<br />

any society in this world which would suit them and assuage their<br />

conscience, they will invariably reply: 'There isn't one, but things might<br />

be better in Red China, in the Soviet Union or in Cuba than they are in<br />

the United States or West Germany. '<br />

When I have then cited economic facts from the Soviet Union, these<br />

have generally been accepted unprotestingly as true; the fact, for instance,<br />

that in Russia in 1960 the differential between maximum and<br />

minimum incomes was something like 40: 1, whereas this ratio in Western<br />

countries such as West Germany, Switzerland, the United States and<br />

England was more like 10: 1, and further that the maximum income tax<br />

in Russia, however high the salary, was 13 per cent. 4<br />

4 On income structure in the Soviet Union see A. Inkeles, Social Change in Soviet<br />

Russia, Cambridge (Mass.), 1968. Also Rudolf Becker, 'Lohnsystem und Lohnpolitik,'<br />

Osteuropa-Handbuch. Sowgetunion. Vas WirtschaJtssystem, ed. Werner<br />

Markert, Cologne-Oraz, 1965, p. 412. Recent information on the social stratification<br />

of Soviet society in accordance with income is to be found in the volume edited by<br />

Boris Meissner for the Deutsche Oesellschaft fur Osteuropakunde, SowjetgesellschaJt<br />

im Wandel. Russlands Weg zur IndustriegesellschaJt, Stuttgart, 1966, pp. 110 ff., 147 f.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!