17.06.2013 Views

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

Schoeck_2010_EnvyATheoryOfSocialBehaviour.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARTHUR KOESTLER 333<br />

social injustice. ' She felt herself to be guilty, and, she tells us, it was only<br />

by degrees that she and Sartre were able to start enjoying and appreciating<br />

the pleasant things of life, such as expensive restaurants. Their<br />

uneasiness over this indirect exploitation of the masses grew ever less<br />

intense.<br />

But Simone de Beauvoir failed to solve the problem of how much<br />

social injustice a successful socialist author may indulge in. i\.ll things<br />

considered, my way of deciding whether or not I should permit myself<br />

certain "concessions," and deny myself others, was entirely arbitrary. It<br />

seems to me impossible to set up any logical principle for one's behaviour<br />

in such matters. ,3<br />

Arthur Koestler<br />

In an autobiographical account Arthur Koestler has recorded an experience<br />

analogous to those of Woodrow Wyatt and Simone de Beauvoir. He,<br />

like so many others, became a communist because of his indignation that<br />

other (richer) people did not experience the same sense of guilt about<br />

their inequality that tormented him whenever he spent something on<br />

himself:<br />

Well aware of the family crisis, and torn by pity for my father [he was an<br />

inventor whose plans were always going wrong] . . . I suffered a pang of<br />

guilt whenever they bought me books or toys. This continued later on, when<br />

every suit I bought for myself meant so much less to send home. Simultaneously,<br />

I developed a strong dislike of the obviously rich; not because they<br />

could afford to buy things (envy plays a much smaller part in social conflict<br />

than is generally assumed) but because they were able to do so without a<br />

guilty conscience. Thus I projected a personal predicament onto the structure<br />

of society at large.<br />

Most unfortunately (so far as the readability of modern social criticism<br />

is concerned), very few of those authors to whom socialism has<br />

come to represent the solution have attained the insight of which<br />

Koestler showed himself capable. 4<br />

3 S. de Beauvoir, La Force des choses. Paris, 1963, pp. 135 f.<br />

4 A. Koestler, in The God That Failed. ed. R. Crossman, New York, 1949, p. 18.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!