20.07.2013 Views

Estimation optimale du gradient du semi-groupe de la chaleur sur le ...

Estimation optimale du gradient du semi-groupe de la chaleur sur le ...

Estimation optimale du gradient du semi-groupe de la chaleur sur le ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

514 J. Van Schaftingen / Journal of Functional Analysis 236 (2006) 490–516<br />

Theorem A.5. If Σ ⊂ R n is compact and has vanishing n-capacity, then d(D(R n \Σ; Λ k−1 R n ))<br />

is <strong>de</strong>nse in L 1 # (Rn ; Λ k R n ).<br />

The proof makes use of a result of Bourgain and Brezis.<br />

Theorem A.6. (Bourgain and Brezis [3]) Let 1 k n − 1. For every ϕ ∈ L1 # (Rn ; ΛkRn ), there<br />

exists ψ ∈ Ln/(n−1) (Rn ; Λk−1Rn ) such that<br />

<br />

dψ = ϕ,<br />

δψ = 0.<br />

Here δ <strong>de</strong>notes the codifferential, i.e. the adjoint of d with respect to Hodge star. This result<br />

is based on inequality (1.7). When k = 1, the meaning<strong>le</strong>ss condition δψ = 0 is dropped and this<br />

is equiva<strong>le</strong>nt with the Nirenberg–Sobo<strong>le</strong>v embedding.<br />

Proof of Theorem A.5. Since the exterior differential d commutes with trans<strong>la</strong>tions, by c<strong>la</strong>ssical<br />

smoothing arguments, (C ∞ ∩ L 1 # )(Rn ; Λ k R n ) is <strong>de</strong>nse in L 1 # (Rn ; Λ k R n ).<br />

Let ϕ ∈ (C ∞ ∩ L 1 # )(Rn ; Λ k R n ) and <strong>le</strong>t Σ ⊂ Ω ⊂ R n be open and boun<strong>de</strong>d. Since Σ has<br />

vanishing capacity, there is a sequence (ηm)m1 in D(Ω) such that 0 ηm 1, ηm = 1ona<br />

neighborhood of Σ and ∇ηmL n (R n ) → 0asn →∞. Moreover, by Poincaré’s inequality, up to<br />

a subsequence, ηm → 0 almost everywhere.<br />

Consi<strong>de</strong>r now the sequence<br />

ψm = (1 − ηm)ζmψ,<br />

where ζm is given by Lemma A.4. By <strong>de</strong>finition, ψm ∈ D(R n ; Λ k−1 R n ). We c<strong>la</strong>im that dψm → ϕ<br />

in L 1 (R n ; Λ k R n ).<br />

In fact,<br />

By Höl<strong>de</strong>r’s inequality,<br />

dψm =−ζm dηm ∧ ψ + (1 − ηm)dζm ∧ ψ + (1 − ηm)ζm ϕ. (A.1)<br />

−ζm dηm ∧ ψ L 1 (R n ) ζmL ∞ (R n )dηmL n (R n )ψ L n/(n−1) (R n ) .<br />

Since ∇ηmL n (R n ) → 0 and ψ L n/(n−1) (R n ) < ∞, the first term in (A.1) tends to zero. A simi<strong>la</strong>r<br />

reasoning holds for the second term, and the <strong>la</strong>st term converges to ϕ as m →∞by Lebesgue’s<br />

dominated convergence theorem. ✷<br />

Corol<strong>la</strong>ry A.7. The set D#(R n ; Λ k R n ) is <strong>de</strong>nse in L 1 # (Rn ; Λ k R n ).<br />

A.2. The clo<strong>sur</strong>e of exact n-forms<br />

Theorem A.6 fails when k = n, and therefore the proof Theorem A.5 fails in this case, but<br />

there is in fact a stronger result.<br />

Theorem A.8. The set d(D(R n ; Λ n−1 R n )) is <strong>de</strong>nse in D#(R n ; Λ n R n ).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!