20.07.2013 Views

Estimation optimale du gradient du semi-groupe de la chaleur sur le ...

Estimation optimale du gradient du semi-groupe de la chaleur sur le ...

Estimation optimale du gradient du semi-groupe de la chaleur sur le ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

466 H. Schultz / Journal of Functional Analysis 236 (2006) 457–489<br />

Theorem 2.9. [2] Let E and F be (not necessarily closed) subspaces of H which are affiliated<br />

with M. 2 Then E ∩ F is affiliated with A, and<br />

E ∩ F = E ∩ F. (2.25)<br />

Lemma 2.10. Consi<strong>de</strong>r i<strong>de</strong>mpotents e, f ∈ ˜M. Let P = Prange(e), Q = Prange(1−e), R = Prange(f )<br />

and S = Prange(1−f). Then ef = feif and only if<br />

Proof. C<strong>le</strong>arly,<br />

(P ∧ R) ∨ (P ∧ S) ∨ (Q ∧ R) ∨ (Q ∧ S) = 1. (2.26)<br />

1 = ef + e(1 − f)+ (1 − e)f + (1 − e)(1 − f). (2.27)<br />

Suppose that ef = fe, and <strong>le</strong>t g1 = ef , g2 = e(1 − f), g3 = (1 − e)f and g4 = (1 − e)(1 − f).<br />

Then g1,...,g4 are i<strong>de</strong>mpotents with support projections P1, P2, P3 and P4, respectively, such<br />

that<br />

<br />

4<br />

<br />

(H) = H. (2.28)<br />

Pi<br />

i=1<br />

Moreover, P1 P ∧ R, P2 P ∧ S, P3 Q ∧ R and P4 Q ∧ S. This shows that (2.26) holds.<br />

On the other hand, assume that (2.26) holds. According to (2.26) and Theorem 2.9,<br />

H0 := D(ef ) ∩ D(f e) ∩ (P ∧ R)(H) + (P ∧ S)(H) + (Q ∧ R)(H) + (Q ∧ S)(H) <br />

is <strong>de</strong>nse in H so it suffices to prove that ef and fe agree on H0. To see this, <strong>le</strong>t ξ ∈ D(ef ) ∩<br />

D(f e) ∩ (P ∧ R)(H). Then<br />

ef ξ = eξ = ξ = fξ = feξ, (2.29)<br />

and simi<strong>la</strong>rly, when ξ ∈ D(ef ) ∩ D(f e) ∩ (P ∧ S)(H), ξ ∈ D(ef ) ∩ D(f e) ∩ (Q ∧ R)(H) or<br />

ξ ∈ D(ef ) ∩ D(f e) ∩ (Q ∧ S)(H). Thus, ef agrees with feon H0. ✷<br />

3. An i<strong>de</strong>mpotent valued mea<strong>sur</strong>e associated with T ∈ M<br />

As in the previous section, consi<strong>de</strong>r a finite von Neumann algebra M with a faithful, normal,<br />

tracial state τ . Inspired by the notion of a spectral mea<strong>sur</strong>e we make the following <strong>de</strong>finition.<br />

Definition 3.1. Let (X, F) <strong>de</strong>note a mea<strong>sur</strong>ab<strong>le</strong> space. An i<strong>de</strong>mpotent valued mea<strong>sur</strong>e on (X, F)<br />

(with values in ˜M) isamape from F into I( ˜M) such that:<br />

(i) e(X) = 1,<br />

(ii) e(F1)e(F2) = e(F2)e(F1) = 0 when F1,F2 ∈ F with F1 ∩ F2 =∅,<br />

2 A subspace E of H is said to be affiliated with M if for all T ∈ M ′ , T(E)⊆ E. Note that if E is affiliated with M,<br />

then the projection onto E belongs to M,andifE is closed, then this is a necessary and sufficient condition for E to be<br />

affiliated with M.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!