20.07.2013 Views

Estimation optimale du gradient du semi-groupe de la chaleur sur le ...

Estimation optimale du gradient du semi-groupe de la chaleur sur le ...

Estimation optimale du gradient du semi-groupe de la chaleur sur le ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Furthermore,<br />

D. Brydges, A. Ta<strong>la</strong>rczyk / Journal of Functional Analysis 236 (2006) 682–711 697<br />

1Vx ¯B(I<br />

<br />

0 if supp ϕ ⊂ Vx,<br />

− pVx )ϕ =<br />

0 if supp ϕ ⊂ Rd \ V x<br />

where we used (3.2) in the second case, so that<br />

A ϕ+ =¯BA ϕL2 |V | −1<br />

<br />

dx 1Vx ¯B(I − pVx )ϕ L2 =|V | −1<br />

<br />

dx 1Vx ¯B(I − pVx )ϕ L2 X(ϕ)<br />

|V | −1 X(ϕ) ϕ+,<br />

where X(ϕ) is the set of x such that 1Vx ¯B(I − pVx∩Λ)ϕ = 0. By the previous equation X(ϕ) is<br />

contained in the set of x such that Vx intersects both supp ϕ and the comp<strong>le</strong>ment of supp ϕ. If<br />

x ∈ X(ϕ), then the smal<strong>le</strong>st ball that covers Vx neither contains nor is disjoint from the smal<strong>le</strong>st<br />

ball that covers supp ϕ. Therefore the distance between the centres of these balls lies in the<br />

interval [R − Dϕ,R+ Dϕ] and there are constants C1,C <strong>de</strong>pending on U such that<br />

|V | −1 <br />

X(ϕ) C1R −d (R + Dϕ) d − (R − Dϕ) d C Dϕ<br />

. ✷<br />

R<br />

Proof of Proposition 2.9. (1) The first item follows immediately by in<strong>du</strong>ction using Theorem<br />

2.8 with U rep<strong>la</strong>ced by Uj ,j = 1, 2,...,n.<br />

(2) Given L, <strong>le</strong>tU0 have diameter D 1 2 (1 − L−1 ). Recall from just before Proposition 2.9<br />

that f1 = f and, for j 2, fj = A ′<br />

j−1 fj−1. By in<strong>du</strong>ction using Lemma 3.8, for j 2,<br />

<br />

j−1<br />

supp fj ⊂ y: dist(y, supp f) D<br />

We find, following the proof of Theorem 2.8, that<br />

Gj (f, f ) = 2 fj ,T ′<br />

j fj<br />

<br />

−,Λ − T ′<br />

j fj ,T ′<br />

j fj<br />

<br />

−,Λ .<br />

k=1<br />

L k<br />

<br />

. (3.6)<br />

By Lemma 3.10, Gj (f, g) = 0 when the supports of fj and the analogously <strong>de</strong>fined gj are<br />

separated by at <strong>le</strong>ast 2Lj D. Therefore, Gj has range 2D j k=1 Lk Lj .<br />

(3) Recall that L ϕ = B ′ Bϕ for ϕ ∈ D(Λ) and that L is the Riesz isometry. The operators<br />

Aj are self-adjoint operators on H+(Λ). It easily follows that A ′<br />

j = LAjL −1 . Therefore<br />

<br />

A ′ ′<br />

n ...A 1f =An ...A1ϕ+ =ϕn+1+, (3.7)<br />

−,Λ<br />

where we have <strong>de</strong>fined ϕj in<strong>du</strong>ctively by setting ϕ1 = ϕ and, for j>1, ϕj = Aj−1ϕj−1. Since<br />

(3.6) says that the diameter of the support of fj is <strong>le</strong>ss than diam supp f + L j−1 and since<br />

Lemma 3.8 allows us to make exactly the same in<strong>du</strong>ction for ϕj , the diameter of the support of<br />

ϕj is boun<strong>de</strong>d by diam supp ϕ + L j−1 which, for j − 1 p, is <strong>le</strong>ss than 2L j−1 because p 0is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!