22.07.2013 Views

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

which usually meant adjusting to the shock of moving<br />

from a rural to an urban environment, these individuals,<br />

<strong>and</strong> in fact entire ethnic groups, began to ascend<br />

the economic ladder, their places at the bottom being<br />

t a ken b y sue c e e din g ge nera t ion s 0 f i mm i gran t s • Thus,<br />

wh i let her e is a perma nen t "bo t tom twen type r cen t" the<br />

i nd i v i dua 1 occupan ts of that category were constant ly<br />

changing.(47) In brief, markets produce classes.<br />

In contrast, a caste is characterized by its rigid<br />

i t y: on e bo r n in t 0 a cas t e r ema ins in i t for 1 i f e. If<br />

the individualist anarchist is correct <strong>and</strong> the wealthy<br />

are able to use government to institutionalize their<br />

p 0 sit ion 0 n e can ref e r tothis as the t rails forma t ion<br />

of a class into a caste. What is important for the<br />

anarchist position is that it is only through governmen<br />

t t hat a soc i 0 - e conom i cposit ion can be ins tit uti 0 n ­<br />

ali zed. Ass hown i n Fig. 1, t his me a n s t hat wh i 1e rna r ­<br />

ket results in classes, governments produce castes.<br />

These concepts are pure types. The question is not:<br />

wh i ch is pr esent class or caste? Elements of both can<br />

market<br />

government<br />

I <br />

class<br />

caste<br />

(fluidity; movement<br />

(rigidity; no<br />

between groups)<br />

intergroup<br />

movement)<br />

Fig. 1: Class <strong>and</strong> Caste Distinctions<br />

be found in all societies. The key question is the<br />

cause of the relative mix of class <strong>and</strong> caste. If the<br />

anarchist analysis is correct, one would expect to find<br />

relat ively fewer castelike features, i.e., more fluidit<br />

y, i n m0 r e rna r ketor i e nted soc i e ties t han inthe m0 r e<br />

go v ernmen t d 0 min atedon e s. A d i c tat 0 r s hip wo u 1d be<br />

expected to contain more castelike features than a<br />

democracy.<br />

For both of these reasons, to avoid confusion with<br />

the Mar x ian a n a I y sis <strong>and</strong> t 0 rna ke c 1ear the a narchis t<br />

bel ief that in statist societies the distinction between<br />

the rul ing el i te <strong>and</strong> other social groups is qui te<br />

rigid, the term caste has been adopted.<br />

The second point needing clarification is the<br />

notion of conspiracy. The anarchist's caste analysis<br />

should not be interpreted as a conspiracy theory.<br />

Analyses of the distribution of power in society are<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!