22.07.2013 Views

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

issued, without more than a h<strong>and</strong>ful of people knowing<br />

the cause, tens of thous<strong>and</strong>s of people whose identity<br />

cou 1 d not be as cer ta i ned by months of invest igat ion,<br />

are made to••• move in the right direction."(B)<br />

c. Distribution.<br />

Since under the free market those eager to earn<br />

profits can do so only by producing better than their<br />

competitors what the consumers desire to buy, the individualist<br />

anarchists contend that there can be no distinction<br />

between production <strong>and</strong> distribution. The more<br />

sa tis factor i ly one serves the consumers, the more profits<br />

he will earn. "The only means to acquire wealth<br />

<strong>and</strong> to preserve it in a market economy not adulterated<br />

by government-made restriction," says <strong>Ludwig</strong> <strong>von</strong> <strong>Mises</strong>,<br />

"is to serve the consumers in the best <strong>and</strong> cheapest<br />

way."(9)<br />

This means that wealth is not dispersed on the<br />

basis of personal moral merit but purely according to<br />

one's a b iIi t y top r 0 v ide 0 the r s wit h wh a t the y wa n t •<br />

While this may be considered unjust from some higher<br />

point of view, the libertarians regard It as one of the<br />

market's greatest merits. The dem<strong>and</strong> for a "just" distribution<br />

of wealth, argues Hayek, implies that wealth<br />

be distributed according to moral merit. But this<br />

mea n s t hat s om e per son 0 r s om e g r 0 up mus t be compIe tel y<br />

cognizant of all the motivations that prompted any individual<br />

to engage in any particular action <strong>and</strong> then<br />

allocate rewards accordingly. But since "we cannot<br />

know or isolate all the circumstances which determine<br />

mer it, tf wit h 0 u t the compIetee1 i mina t ion 0 fin d i v i d ua 1<br />

privacy, the allocation of wealth according to "merit"<br />

is incompatible with a free society.(lO)<br />

The dispersion of wealth in a market society, libertarians<br />

argue, is in itself neither just nor unjust.<br />

It is functional from the point of view of facilitating<br />

the satisfaction of all market participants; it is also<br />

an integral aspect of a free society.<br />

d. <strong>State</strong>, Economy <strong>and</strong> Conscious Coordination.<br />

Since the market process spontaneously coordinates<br />

the act ion s 0 f a II me r ke t pe r tic i pe n t s tIt canoperat e<br />

wit h the u t m0 s t dec e n t r ali z a t ion 0 f know 1e d ge. S uc h<br />

ope rat ion permit s eve r yon e t 0 de vis e <strong>and</strong> pur sue his ow n<br />

p I a n s, run n i n g the gam u t from pur ely s elf ish to a 1 t r uist<br />

IC. It makes no difference what ends any individual<br />

226

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!