Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FOOTNOTES<br />
{I )Alex<strong>and</strong>er Berkman, ABC of Anarchism (London:<br />
<strong>Freedom</strong> Press, 1973), p. 9.<br />
(2 )Peter Kropotkin, "Law, the Supporter of Crime,"<br />
Patterns of Anarchy, eds. Leonard Krimmerman <strong>and</strong><br />
Lew i s Per r y ( New Y0 r k : Do ubI e day <strong>and</strong> Co., 19 68 ), p •<br />
292.<br />
(3)Peter Kropotkin, The Conquest of Bread (New<br />
York: Benjamin Bloom, 1968),p. 18; Berkman,pp. 74-75.<br />
(4)Peter Kropotkin, "A Scientific Approach to<br />
Com m u n i s t Ana r chi s m," Pat terns of An arc h y, e d s •<br />
Leonard Krimmerman <strong>and</strong> Lewis Perry (New York: Doubleday<br />
<strong>and</strong> Co'., 1968), p. 226. .<br />
( 5) Be r kma n, p. 31.<br />
(6)Richard <strong>and</strong> Ernestine Perkins, Precondition for<br />
Peace <strong>and</strong> Prosperity: Rational Anarchy (Ontario:<br />
Private Publication, 1971), p. 9.<br />
( 7 ) L u dwig <strong>von</strong> Mis e s, Soc i ali s m ( London: J. Cape ,<br />
1969), pp. 37-42. And Murray Rothbard, Power <strong>and</strong><br />
Market (Menlo Park, Calif.: <strong>Institute</strong> for Humane<br />
Studies, Inc., 1970), p. 139.<br />
(8)Friedrich A. Hayek, The Road to' Serfdom<br />
(Chicago: Phoenix Books, 1967). See especially Chapter<br />
Ten, "Why the Worst Get on Top," pp. 134-52. For a<br />
reply to Hayek see Herman Finer, The Road to Reaction<br />
( B 0 s ton: Lit tie, Brownan d Co., 1945). Wh i Ie Hayek<br />
sees corruption <strong>and</strong> the abuse of power as endemic to<br />
po lit i cs, Finer sees them as largely a funct ion of \he<br />
type of political order <strong>and</strong>, in a democracy at least,<br />
the ex c e p t ion rat her t han the r u Ie. Robe r t Ni s be t ,<br />
however, has recently advanced the interesting proposition<br />
that, if anything, these things would occur with<br />
greater regUlarity in a democracy than in other political<br />
orders: "Democracy, with its tacit responsibility<br />
to the electorate, with its accountability in some deg<br />
r e e to leg i s I a t u res, pre s s, <strong>and</strong> pub 1 i c, ca r r i e s a<br />
larger 'potential for deception than is likely in other<br />
forms of government simply by virtue of this accountabiii<br />
t Y • " The Tw iIi g h t 0 f Aut h 0 r i t Y (N ew Yo r k: Ox ford<br />
University Press, 1975), p. 17. Regardless of whether<br />
one subscribes to the Hayekian <strong>and</strong> Finerian explanation<br />
of political corruption <strong>and</strong> abuse of power, empirical<br />
documentat ion of these phenomena in this country is<br />
certainly abundant. Watergate, of course, comes first<br />
to mind. Of the legions of books now written on the<br />
sub j e c t, The 0 d 0 r e Whit e 's The Brea c h 0 f Fa i t h ( New<br />
York: Dell, 1975) is the most balanced <strong>and</strong> reflective<br />
t 0 a p pea r t h u s far. Someat t em ptis now be i ng rna d e to<br />
place Watergate in historical perspective. Jarol<br />
67