22.07.2013 Views

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

qUIckly find hImself with few customers. Rothbard <strong>and</strong><br />

B I 0 c k fur the r a r g u e t hat i two u I d be c us t oma r y for<br />

homeowners to negotiate long term contracts with the<br />

road owner prohibiting just such capricious price<br />

hikes. "With this sort of 'easement' provided in advance<br />

by contract," Rothbard writes, "no such sudden<br />

blockade would be allowed, since it would be an invasion<br />

of the property rights of the l<strong>and</strong>owner."(12)<br />

e. Safety.<br />

The final objection is that since a private road<br />

s y s tern w0 u I d permit the own e r s to set the i r own r u I e s<br />

<strong>and</strong> regulat ions, it would result in a confusing array<br />

of contradictory regulations which, in turn, would jeopardize<br />

the safety of the drivers. Libertarians mainta<br />

i n tha t such a scenar io is highly improbable. True,<br />

road owners would be responsible for regulating their<br />

own property. If a company were negligent in the upkeep<br />

of its roads, permitting dangerous potholes to remain<br />

unrepaired, or if it were lax in the stipulation<br />

<strong>and</strong> enforcement of appropriate h'ighway rules, permittin<br />

g r e c k I e s s d r i v e r s t 0 endange r the I i ve s of 0 the r s<br />

- - 0 r if it in any other way made cond it ions i nconvenient<br />

for its patrons -- it would soon find its custome<br />

r s us i ng other roads. Thus, says Rothbard,. "any rna verick<br />

road owner who insisted on a left-h<strong>and</strong> drive or a<br />

green for' stop' instead of 'go' would soon find himsel<br />

f wi th numerous accIdents <strong>and</strong> the disappearance of<br />

customers <strong>and</strong> users."(13)<br />

On the related question of safety the libertarian<br />

finds it ironic that anyone could defend the current<br />

system against one privately run by citing the issue of<br />

safety. The current publIC system routinely results in<br />

the deaths of 50,000 Americans a year. This can hardly<br />

be termed a raving success. As Block puts it, "a worse<br />

job than that which is presently being done by the government<br />

road managers is difficult to envision." The<br />

problem stems precisely from the disjunction between<br />

income <strong>and</strong> performance inherent In the very nature of a<br />

government operation. A civil servant, argues Block,<br />

draws hIS annual salary regardless of the<br />

accident toll piled up under his domain. But<br />

1 f hewer e apr 1 vat e own e r 0 f the r 08 d .<br />

then he would indeed lose out if his road<br />

com p i led a poor sa f e t y r e cor d. . . He wo u 1d<br />

then have every incentive to try to reduce<br />

281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!