22.07.2013 Views

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

initial, faddish interest in the project dies down, the<br />

producers will move in with pressure for exemptions <strong>and</strong><br />

other special rulings."(49) The libertarian, therefore,<br />

opposes all regulation not only on moral but on<br />

practical grounds as well.<br />

But how would the market be able to protect the<br />

interests of the consumers in the absence of regulation?<br />

Libertarians believe that there are any number<br />

of noncoercive ways that this could be h<strong>and</strong>led. First,<br />

Hospers points out that a company's good name is its<br />

best guarantee of its future business. Businessmen are<br />

no more inherently trustworthy or honest than any other<br />

soc i a 1 g r 0 up. But the f r e e rna r ke t p I acesam0 net a r y<br />

inc e n t i veon h 0 nest y • Chea ting rna y res u Itin ash0 r t ­<br />

term gain, but a company that incurs a reputation for<br />

c h eat i n g its pa t ron s wi I Iso0 n fin d itself wit h 0 utany<br />

patrons <strong>and</strong>, thus, going out of business. Since the<br />

market works to reward honesty <strong>and</strong> penalize dishonesty,<br />

it is believed that a totally free market would actually<br />

serve to raise rather thanWlower st<strong>and</strong>ards.(SO)<br />

It is also likely that a laissez faire society<br />

w0 u 1 d g i v e r i set 0 m0 rema g a z i n e s s u chas Cons ume r<br />

Rep 0 r t s, pro v i din g sub s c rib e r s .wit h i n for rna t ion 0 n<br />

eve r y t h i n g fro m the qua lit Y 0 f pa r ticu Iarbr<strong>and</strong> s 0 f<br />

safety pins to individual physicians. While certainly<br />

not a I 1, 0 rev e n m0 s t, w0 uIdsubs c ribe t 0 s u c h rna ga ­<br />

zines, economists such as Friedman contend that even<br />

the careless shopper would be better protected in the<br />

absence of government controls. "Producers," he says,<br />

work on a margin, like everybody else. If<br />

the five percent of shoppers who are carefUl<br />

spot a clever misrepresentation, they'll<br />

leave the store. That's enough pressure on<br />

the store owner. The infrequent shopper<br />

assumes this when he goes to a store that's<br />

popular. There has to be a reason for its<br />

popularity, he decides. The reason is that<br />

it appeals to those who are very carefUl<br />

about measures <strong>and</strong> labels <strong>and</strong> that sort of<br />

thing.(Sl)<br />

There are other devices by which consumers would<br />

be able to protect themselves. While anyone in a libertarIan<br />

society would be able to enter any occupation<br />

he desires, includIng those of physician <strong>and</strong> lawyer,<br />

libertarians do not regard this as a problem. First,<br />

the market would insure that only the most competent<br />

293

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!