Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

FOOTNOTES
( 1 ) F ran z 0 p pen h e i mer, The S tat e ( New Yo r k: F r e e
L i feE d i t ion s, 1975), p. x x xi; a 1s 0 see pp. 96-1 01 ;
Emil Kauder, "The Intellectural and Political Roots of
t he 0 1 de r A u s t r i an Schoo I ," Z e i t sc h r i f t fur
Nationalokonomie XVII (1958). pp. 420-21; also see
Ludwig von Mises, The Historical Setting of the
Austr ian School of Economics (New Rochelle: Arlington
H0 use, 19 69 ), Pp. 29 - 34 •
(2)See, for example, Yale Brozen, "Is Government
the Source of Monopoly?," The Intercollegiate Review
(Winter, 1968-1969), pp. 67-68; and Adam Smith, The
Wealth of Nations (New Rochelle: Arlington House,
n.d.), especially Vol. II, pg. 72: fl ••• it is the interest
of the merchants and manufactures of every country
t 0 see uret 0 thems e I ve s the m0 n 0 pol Y 0 f the home
mar k e t. Hene e, i n Great Br ita in, and i n mo s tother European
countries, the extraordinary duties upon almost
a 11 goods imported by al ien merchants. Hence the high
d uti e sand proh i bit i onsup0 n a I I thos e for e ign rna n u f aet
u res whie h e a n e 0 me i n toe 0 mpet i t ion wit h 0 ur own.
Hence too the extraordinary restraints upon the import
a t ion 0 f a I m0 s t a I Iso r t s 0 f good s from thosec0 un ­
tries with which the balance of trade is supposed to be
disadvantageous."
(3)Eunice Schuster, Native American Anarchism
( New Yo r k: AL\1S Pres s, 19 7 0 ), D • 1 3 .
(4)Murray Rothbard, "-Individualist Anarchism in
the United States: Origins," Libertarian Analysis
(Winter 1970), p. 14.
(S)Schuster, p. 42; also see Corinne Jacker, The
B I a e k F I agofAn archis m (N e w Y0 r k: Cha r I e sSeribne r
and Sons, 1968), pp. 25-26.
(6 )Schus ter, p. 41.
(7)Jaeker, p. 10. David Deleon, in his The
American as Anarchist (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press,
1978), argues that the individual ism of indigenous
American anarchism is rooted in three factors: religion,
the great open frontier, and capitalism. Protestantism
certainly did individualize religion. But
since it would have the same impact on both sides of
the A t 1ant i c, I don T t see how i t ca n be a fa c tor explaining
the individualism in America as distinct
from the collectivism in Europe. Moreover, it should
not be for got ten t hat man y 0 f tho s e wh 0 a r r i ve d at
their anarchism via their religious individualism did
not become individual ist anarchists at all, but
anarcho-communists. Leo Tolstoy in Russia and John
213