Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

(38)Hayek, p. 35.
(39)See Robert Nozick, Anarehy. State and Utopia
( New Y0 r k: Bas i c Bo 0 ks, 19 7 4), for a c r i t i que 0 fana r ­
chism from the "underdetermined areas" perspective.
For a go 0 d rep I y to th is po i n t of view see Er i c Mack,
"Nozick's Anarchism," Anarchism, eds.: J. Roland
Pennock and John Chapman (New York: New York University
Press, 1978), pp. 55-58. Also see John Sneed, "Order
Wit h 0 u t Law: Wher e Wi I I the Ana r chi s t s Ke e p the Ma dmen?",
Journal of Libertarian Studies (Spring 1977),
p. 122: "The rules of evidence would tend to standardize
quickly in minute detail, although the admissibilit
y and wei g h t g i ve n totape r ecordin gs, hea r say, po I ygraph
••• and other questions of this magnitude would
probably not be resolved to all companies' satisfaction.
In the absence of agreement between the companies
as to the rules of evidence or procedure, the arbitrator
would generally settle that dispute also, and in
effect set his own rules."
(40)Sneed, p. 121. Also see Friedman, pp. 155-64.
(41 )Jerome Tucci lie, Radical Libertarianism (New
York: Harper and Row, 1971), p. 66.
(42 )Kar 1 Hess, The Death of Politics (New York:
Laissez-Faire Books, n.d.), p. 17. Also see the
excellent elaboration of these possibilities by the
minarchist, Robert Nozick, pp. 297-374; and Spencer
Mac Ca I I um, The Art 0 f Communit y ( Men loPark, Ca 1 • :
Institute for Humane Studies, 1970).
( 4 3 ) S eea b 0 v e , Chapter I I I , Section 4 • Also see
Robe r t Nisbet, The Quest for Communi ty (London:
Oxford, 1953), and his The Sociological Tradition
(New York: Basic Books, 1966), especially pp. 47-220.
(44)Jeffrey Paul, "Anarchism and Natural Rights"
( Pap e r pre sen ted a t the Ame rica n Ass 0 cia t ion for the
Philosophic StUdy of Society, October 6,1977), pp.
2-3. This issue is also raised in John Hosper's
art i c 1 e " Will Rot h bard's Fr e e Ma r ke t Jus tice Suf fiee ?
No," Reason (May 1973), p. 18.
( 45 ) This, I t h ink, is wha t Ro t hba r d mean t by his
statement that "1 see no reason whatever why anyone
should worry about the consent of criminals to their
jus t pun ishmen t • " In"Will Rot h bar d's F r e e Ma r ke t
Justice Suffice? Yes," p. 25.
(46)Murray Rothbard, "Society Without a State"
(Paper delivered before the American Society for Polit
i ca I and Legal Phi losophy, \\ashington, D.C., December
28, 1 9 7 4 ); rep r i n ted inAn 8 r chi s m, e d s .: J. Ro I and
Pennock and John Chapman (New York: New York University
Press, 1978), pp. 191-207.
(47)William Wooldridge, Uncle Sam the Monopoly
379