Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(73)Lys<strong>and</strong>er Spooner, "No Treason, Number Six,"<br />
The Collected Works of Lys<strong>and</strong>er Spooner Vol.<br />
(Weston, Mass.: M<strong>and</strong> S Press, 1971), pp. 1-59.<br />
( 7 4 ) F red Mille r, " L Ysan dera n d Lim i ted Go vern <br />
ment," Reason (May, 1976) pp. 19-21, asserts that<br />
Spooner's argument is actually consistent only with<br />
1 imi ted government, <strong>and</strong> not anarchism. To some extent,<br />
this is a matter of semantics. If we define.government<br />
so as to make it compatible with no initiated force,<br />
then Spooner's philosophy is consistent with limited<br />
government. But then so are the philosophies of all<br />
other anarchists.<br />
(75)Lys<strong>and</strong>er Spooner, "An Essay on the Trial by<br />
Jury," The Collected Works of Lys<strong>and</strong>er Spooner, Vol.<br />
I I ( We s ton, Ma s s .: M<strong>and</strong> S Pres s, 19 7 1 ), P • 6.<br />
(76)Ibid. For a sneering "analysis" of<br />
Spooner's ideas see A. John Alex<strong>and</strong>er, "The Ideas of<br />
Lys<strong>and</strong>er Spooner," The New Engl<strong>and</strong> Quarterly (June<br />
1950), pp. 200-17. For a more sympathetic treatment of<br />
Spooner see such works as CarlWatner, "Lys<strong>and</strong>er<br />
Spooner, Libertarian Pioneer," Reason (March, 1973),<br />
pp. 20-23; Carl Watner, "Lys<strong>and</strong>er Spooner: From<br />
Constitutional Lawyer to Individualist Anarchist," Ope<br />
cit.; Martin, pp. 167-201; <strong>and</strong> Reichert, pp. 117-40.<br />
Also of interest is Charles Shively's "BIography" of<br />
Spooner in The Collected Works of Lys<strong>and</strong>er Spooner,<br />
V0 I. I ( We s t on, Ma s s .: M<strong>and</strong> S Pre s s, 19 7 1 ), Pp. 15 - 62 .<br />
( 7 7 ) Ma x S t i r n e r, The Ego <strong>and</strong> His Own ( New Yo r k :<br />
Dover PUblishing, 1973), p. 5.<br />
(78)Ibid., p. 179.<br />
( 79 ) T u c k e r, "I n d i v i d u a ISo v ere i gn t y Our Goa I , "<br />
Ins tea d 0 f aBo 0 k, P • 1 32 • Ric ha r d His k e s has rna d e a<br />
very strong case that "to the extent that Tucker<br />
believes in equal liberty he is no egoist." See his<br />
Community <strong>and</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong>: The Political Theory of Cooperative<br />
Individualism (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation:<br />
Indiana University, 1979). See especially, p. 128: "To<br />
advocat'e egoism or the view that the 'only source of<br />
reasons for action lies in the interests of the<br />
agents,' precludes one from making dem<strong>and</strong>s or claims on<br />
others on any other basis than that of the power or<br />
·brute force one has to back up the claims. As a pacifist,<br />
Tucker would shrink at such a prospect; as an<br />
anarchist he must reject it, for of all types of political<br />
discontents anarchists are without doubt the most<br />
'resentfUl' of the political world in which they live."<br />
Further, Hlskes notes, Tucker's concern for "the law of<br />
equal liberty" actually smuggles in natural law principles<br />
(pp. 129-30).<br />
(80)Tucker, "A CrIticism That Does Not Apply,fl<br />
219