22.07.2013 Views

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Freedom, Society, and State - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

will become practically indistinguishable.<br />

c. Anarcho-syndicalism.<br />

Syndicalism is both an organizational structure <strong>and</strong><br />

a method of overthrowing the capitalist system. As a<br />

method, syndicalism, as popularized by Georges<br />

Sorei ( 29 ), i sarno v em en t pr em is ed on t he "my t h of the<br />

general strike" <strong>and</strong> the use of force. Violence, it is<br />

held, is necessary to overthrow both capitalism <strong>and</strong> the<br />

capitalist state. But to galvanize the workers into<br />

act ion, the y mu s t be 1 i eve inthe i nex 0 r a b 1e t r i urn ph 0 f<br />

their cause. It is this function that the "myth" fulfills.<br />

For by believing that the general strike will<br />

produce the triumph of their cause, it brings into relief<br />

the class antagonisms of the capitalist system. In<br />

do i ng so it un it es the proletar iat, producing an "epic<br />

state of mind" which rouses the proletariat to acts of<br />

"heroism."(30) This triumph of the proletarian will<br />

wi 11 eventually culminate in the overthrow of capitalism.<br />

Bel ief in the myth of the i r inev i table vi ctory, in<br />

other words, produces a will to action that does,<br />

indeed, make their victory inevitable.(31) Such, briefly,<br />

is the method of syndicalism.<br />

We are most interested, however, in the organizational<br />

{ramework that will prevail once syndicalism has<br />

tr iumphed. There is an important difference between<br />

synd i ca 1 ism <strong>and</strong> communism on the quest ion of the ownership<br />

of the means of production. While both aim to expropriate<br />

these from the capitalist, under communism, as<br />

envisioned by Kropotkin, all workers would collectively<br />

own all capital. Under syndicalism, however, only those<br />

workers in a particular industry would own the means of<br />

product i on wi thin that industry. This bears an obvious<br />

resemblance to the collectivism of Bakunin, <strong>and</strong> Bakuninism<br />

may actually be seen as a variant of syndicalism, as<br />

can the mutualism of Proudhon.<br />

The essential aspect of syndicalism is workers'<br />

control according to industry. While these syndicates<br />

o r i n d u s t ria lor g ani za t ion s are t 0 be aut 0 nom 0 us, they<br />

are n eve r the 1 esst 0 bel00s ely con federa t ed, bot h ge0g<br />

rap h i cal I y a s weI 1 a s fun c t ionall y • The wo r k e r sin<br />

each locality, according to Rudolph Rocker, will join<br />

the unions of their respective trades. All the unions<br />

in a given region will then be combined into Labor<br />

Chambers. It would be the responsibility of the Labor<br />

Chambers "to determIne the needs of the inhabitants of<br />

their districts <strong>and</strong> organize local consumption." On the<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!