Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ank of the river] has increasingly been the site of criminal activity in the<br />
Melbourne CBD. [Southbank has been developed as a tourist, casino <strong>and</strong><br />
entertainment area. It includes outdoor gas flame balls that occasionally burn<br />
unfortunate pigeons <strong>and</strong> seagulls. Public <strong>and</strong> commercial lighting in the area<br />
underwent a great expansion in the years following 1995.] The number of offences<br />
committed in the Southbank area increased by nearly 600 per cent between 1995 <strong>and</strong><br />
2000… Dockl<strong>and</strong>s [a large downstream area, formerly dimly lit or unlit] is the<br />
location of only 0.4 per cent of all recorded crime in the Melbourne CBD, which is<br />
perhaps to be expected given that it is a relatively undeveloped area at present.”<br />
The Victorian government is encouraging the development of Dockl<strong>and</strong>s. This includes a<br />
requirement that a fixed percentage of development expenditure has to be spent on<br />
beautifying the area. A substantial part of this expenditure seems to be going into decorative<br />
lighting (eg upwardly aimed floodlighting of trees, buildings <strong>and</strong> structures, light pattern<br />
projection onto silos), which appears likely to bring its own unforeseen consequences in the<br />
form of more crime in due course. Vicpol (2002b) data for Dockl<strong>and</strong>s gives crime numbers<br />
from 1997-1998 to 2001-2002 as 29, 54, 102, 163 <strong>and</strong> 157. In the normal course of events,<br />
attempts to stem this unpleasant trend would include putting in even more lights.<br />
5.6.2.2 Serious drugs crime<br />
DCPC (2001) includes figures showing street numbers recorded by police in cases of serious<br />
drugs offences in Melbourne’s Bourke <strong>and</strong> Russell Streets for each year from 1995 to 2000.<br />
These intersecting streets are two of fourteen major streets that run the length <strong>and</strong> breadth of<br />
the rectangular central city grid. Together these two streets had 1196 serious drugs crime<br />
arrests, 75 about 56% of the city’s total, for years 1995 through 2000. Unfortunately, in only<br />
18.2% of these cases did police record the nearest street number. Regardless, the available<br />
street number information does indicate the existence of hotspots for drugs crime, with some<br />
progressive movement as well as occasional abrupt changes taking place from year to year.<br />
The street numbers data for serious drugs crime in 2000 from DCPC (2001) are redrawn in<br />
Figures 15 <strong>and</strong> 16. The total number of cases represented is unknown, but is estimated by<br />
linear proportion without growth to be about 40 for the year. 76 This is more than the total of<br />
32 arrest locations shown in Figures 15 <strong>and</strong> 16, viz 19 + 13. It is likely to be more than 40<br />
given that growth in drugs crime has caused much public concern. Some of the triangle<br />
symbols in the figures are therefore highly likely to represent locations of multiple arrests.<br />
The July 2002 values of horizontal plane illuminance along the streets are included. 77 Note<br />
75 ‘Serious’ means cultivation, possession of commercial quantities or trafficking.<br />
76 The writer made a detailed request to the Drugs <strong>and</strong> <strong>Crime</strong> Prevention Committee for the<br />
actual street numbers <strong>and</strong> numbers of arrests at each. Months <strong>and</strong> several follow-ups later, the<br />
reply stated that there was no authority to release such data. No response at all was received<br />
when the requests were redirected to the Victoria Police as suggested.<br />
77 The photometric survey of Bourke <strong>and</strong> Russell Streets was done by the writer between 8-<br />
30 pm <strong>and</strong> 10-15 pm in dry conditions on a Monday night, 2002-07-01, with some checks <strong>and</strong><br />
supplementary measurements between 11-15 pm <strong>and</strong> 12-45 am nine days later. Five<br />
approximately equally spaced measurements were made along the middle of the footpaths of<br />
each block on each side of the streets, <strong>and</strong> the nearest street number was noted for each<br />
89