11.08.2013 Views

Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper

Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper

Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Los Angeles, San Diego’s crime rate could be expected to tend towards that of Los Angeles,<br />

hardly the result intended by the ‘more <strong>and</strong> brighter’ lighting proponents in San Diego. If the<br />

relighting decision is allowed to st<strong>and</strong>, collection of serial photometric <strong>and</strong> crime data well<br />

before <strong>and</strong> after the relighting should be considered, bearing in mind the problems of<br />

inadequately planned lighting <strong>and</strong> crime experiments described in Part 1.<br />

Although the study of relatively isolated large-scale opportunities such as the San Diego<br />

relighting may lead to progress in knowledge of lighting <strong>and</strong> crime, any such advance may<br />

take several more years for sufficient time-series data to be collected. This presumes that<br />

adequate before data are available. As the plan is to replace the low-pressure lights over a<br />

five-year period, the absence of an abrupt change could reduce the sensitivity of the<br />

experiment <strong>and</strong> make generalisation of the results more difficult. Meanwhile, existing largerscale<br />

evidence relevant to the hypothesis has been identified, <strong>and</strong> is now presented.<br />

5.2 CRIME AND MEASURES OF CITY LIGHT<br />

5.2.1 Satellite measures of upward light energy losses at night<br />

Satellite measurements of artificial light radiated upward at night from populated areas of<br />

Earth are mentioned in Section 2.1.2 above. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1993,<br />

the US Air Force allowed the Operational Linescan System (OLS) of the US Defense<br />

Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) to be used on suitable occasions for non-military<br />

scientific observations. Although the nighttime part of the system was designed to detect<br />

clouds illuminated by moonlight, it was found that its sensitivity could be reduced sufficiently<br />

by ground control to allow mostly unsaturated detection of city lights on nights close to New<br />

Moon (eg Elvidge, Baugh, Kihn, Kroehl <strong>and</strong> Davis 1997; Cinzano, Falchi <strong>and</strong> Elvidge 2001).<br />

The resolution achievable at the ground is dependent on the viewing geometry from orbit. In<br />

the usual configuration, the projected (binned) pixel size is typically in the order of 2.8 km<br />

square, small enough to give useful indications of the energy emitted by aggregated artificial<br />

light associated with terrestrial human activity at various places. The threshold sensitivity<br />

corresponds to a population density of only about 8 persons per square kilometre (Nakayama<br />

<strong>and</strong> Elvidge 1999). The availability of data about the upward light emissions of cities <strong>and</strong><br />

towns provides an opportunity to test the new hypothesis in the cases where crime data are<br />

also available. Before such tests are described, however, it is important to underst<strong>and</strong> the<br />

limitations of the satellite data.<br />

Isobe <strong>and</strong> Hamamura (1998) <strong>and</strong> Isobe (2000) listed upward light energy loss data for 153<br />

cities from 52 different countries. They did not state whether these data were for:<br />

• the DMSP OLS sensor response weighted by the luminosity function or similar to give<br />

the CIE luminosity response,<br />

• the astronomers’ V (visible) b<strong>and</strong> response, or, as appears more likely,<br />

• left unweighted as a measure of radiant energy detected by the sensor, a multiplier<br />

phototube.<br />

The sensor response extends from 0.47 µm to 0.95 µm (Chor-pang Lo 2002), which is not the<br />

0.38 µm to 0.77 µm range of visible light. The sensor response is described as VNIR (visible<br />

<strong>and</strong> near infrared) by Elvidge et al. (1997). To add to the uncertainty, the data given by Isobe<br />

<strong>and</strong> Hamamura for cities in Turkey <strong>and</strong> elsewhere are repeated in a different paper (Aslan <strong>and</strong><br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!